Argumentative Evidences Classification and Argument Scheme Detection Using Tree Kernels
The purpose of this study is to deploy a novel methodology for classifying different argumentative support (supporting evidences) in arguments, without considering the context. The proposed methodology is based on the idea that the use of Tree Kernel algorithms can be a good way to discriminate between different types of argumentative stances without the need of highly engineered features. This can be useful in different Argumentation Mining sub-tasks. This work provides an example of classifier built using a Tree Kernel method, which can discriminate between different kinds of argumentative support with a high accuracy. The ability to distinguish different kinds of support is, in fact, a key step toward Argument Scheme classification.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
General ClassificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Developing an argument annotation scheme based on a semantic classification of arguments
Corpora of argumentative discourse are commonly analyzed in terms of argumentative units, consisting of claims and premises. Both argument detection and classification are complex discourse processing tasks. Our paper in…
ClassificationArgumentative Segmentation Enhancement for Legal Summarization
We use the combination of argumentative zoning [1] and a legal argumentative scheme to create legal argumentative segments. Based on the argumentative segmentation, we propose a novel task of classifying argumentative se…
Segmentation"Laughing at you or with you": The Role of Sarcasm in Shaping the Disagreement Space
Detecting arguments in online interactions is useful to understand how conflicts arise and get resolved. Users often use figurative language, such as sarcasm, either as persuasive devices or to attack the opponent by an …
ClassificationGeneral ClassificationRelationRelation Classification+1``Laughing at you or with you'': The Role of Sarcasm in Shaping the Disagreement Space
Detecting arguments in online interactions is useful to understand how conflicts arise and get resolved. Users often use figurative language, such as sarcasm, either as persuasive devices or to attack the opponent by an …
ClassificationRelationRelation ClassificationSarcasm DetectionTraditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Argumentation Mining in Russian Texts
Argumentation mining is a field of computational linguistics that is devoted to extracting from texts and classifying arguments and relations between them, as well as constructing an argumentative structure. A significan…
BIG-bench Machine LearningMachine TranslationTranslation