Attentive Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidence
Deep models are the defacto standard in visual decision models due to their impressive performance on a wide array of visual tasks. However, they are frequently seen as opaque and are unable to explain their decisions. In contrast, humans can justify their decisions with natural language and point to the evidence in the visual world which led to their decisions. We postulate that deep models can do this as well and propose our Pointing and Justification (PJ-X) model which can justify its decision with a sentence and point to the evidence by introspecting its decision and explanation process using an attention mechanism. Unfortunately there is no dataset available with reference explanations for visual decision making. We thus collect two datasets in two domains where it is interesting and challenging to explain decisions. First, we extend the visual question answering task to not only provide an answer but also a natural language explanation for the answer. Second, we focus on explaining human activities which is traditionally more challenging than object classification. We extensively evaluate our PJ-X model, both on the justification and pointing tasks, by comparing it to prior models and ablations using both automatic and human evaluations.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Decision MakingQuestion AnsweringSentenceVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Attentive Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidence (Extended Abstract)
Deep models are the defacto standard in visual decision problems due to their impressive performance on a wide array of visual tasks. On the other hand, their opaqueness has led to a surge of interest in explainable syst…
Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidence
Deep models that are both effective and explainable are desirable in many settings; prior explainable models have been unimodal, offering either image-based visualization of attention weights or text-based generation of …
Activity RecognitionExplainable ModelsQuestion AnsweringVisual Question Answering+1Where and When: Space-Time Attention for Audio-Visual Explanations
Explaining the decision of a multi-modal decision-maker requires to determine the evidence from both modalities. Recent advances in XAI provide explanations for models trained on still images. However, when it comes to m…
Explainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Multimodal Deep LearningBeyond Verification: Abductive Explanations for Post-AI Assessment of Privacy Leakage
Privacy leakage in AI-based decision processes poses significant risks, particularly when sensitive information can be inferred. We propose a formal framework to audit privacy leakage using abductive explanations, which …
Explainable Decision Making with Lean and Argumentative Explanations
It is widely acknowledged that transparency of automated decision making is crucial for deployability of intelligent systems, and explaining the reasons why some decisions are "good" and some are not is a way to achievin…
Decision Making