paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Auto-Evaluation with Few Labels through Post-hoc Regression

2024-11-19 · Benjamin Eyre, David Madras

Continually evaluating large generative models provides a unique challenge. Often, human annotations are necessary to evaluate high-level properties of these models (e.g. in text or images). However, collecting human annotations of samples can be resource intensive, and using other machine learning systems to provide the annotations, or automatic evaluation, can introduce systematic errors into the evaluation. The Prediction Powered Inference (PPI) framework provides a way of leveraging both the statistical power of automatic evaluation and a small pool of labelled data to produce a low-variance, unbiased estimate of the quantity being evaluated for. However, most work on PPI considers a relatively sizable set of labelled samples, which is not always practical to obtain. To this end, we present two new PPI-based techniques that leverage robust regressors to produce even lower variance estimators in the few-label regime.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2411.12665

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

regression

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Posterior Consistency of Semi-Supervised Regression on Graphs

2020-07-25 · Andrea L. Bertozzi, Bamdad Hosseini, Hao Li, Kevin Miller 외

Graph-based semi-supervised regression (SSR) is the problem of estimating the value of a function on a weighted graph from its values (labels) on a small subset of the vertices. This paper is concerned with the consisten…

Clusteringregression

Normalizing Flow Regression for Bayesian Inference with Offline Likelihood Evaluations

2025-04-15 · Chengkun Li, Bobby Huggins, Petrus Mikkola, Luigi Acerbi

Bayesian inference with computationally expensive likelihood evaluations remains a significant challenge in many scientific domains. We propose normalizing flow regression (NFR), a novel offline inference method for appr…

Bayesian Inferenceregression

Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?

2020-07-06 · CVPR 2021 1 · Weijian Deng, Liang Zheng

To calculate the model accuracy on a computer vision task, e.g., object recognition, we usually require a test set composing of test samples and their ground truth labels. Whilst standard usage cases satisfy this require…

Object Recognitionregression

Harmless label noise and informative soft-labels in supervised classification

2021-04-07 · Daniel Ahfock, Geoffrey J. McLachlan

Manual labelling of training examples is common practice in supervised learning. When the labelling task is of non-trivial difficulty, the supplied labels may not be equal to the ground-truth labels, and label noise is i…

ClassificationGeneral Classificationregression

UrbanAlign: Post-hoc Semantic Calibration for VLM-Human Preference Alignment

2026-02-23 · Yecheng Zhang, Rong Zhao, Zhizhou Sha, Yong Li 외 arxiv

Vision-language models (VLMs) can describe urban scenes in rich detail, yet consistently fail to produce reliable human preference labels in domain-specific tasks such as safety assessment and aesthetic evaluation. The s…