paper-with-me

Papers

AutoMonitor-Bench: Evaluating the Reliability of LLM-Based Misbehavior Monitor

2026-01-09 · Shu Yang, Jingyu Hu, Tong Li, Hanqi Yan, Wenxuan Wang, Di Wang arxiv

We introduce AutoMonitor-Bench, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the reliability of LLM-based misbehavior monitors across diverse tasks and failure modes. AutoMonitor-Bench consists of 3,010 carefully annotated test samples spanning question answering, code generation, and reasoning, with paired misbehavior and benign instances. We evaluate monitors using two complementary metrics: Miss Rate (MR) and False Alarm Rate (FAR), capturing failures to detect misbehavior and oversensitivity to benign behavior, respectively. Evaluating 12 proprietary and 10 open-source LLMs, we observe substantial variability in monitoring performance and a consistent trade-off between MR and FAR, revealing an inherent safety-utility tension. To further explore the limits of monitor reliability, we construct a large-scale training corpus of 153,581 samples and fine-tune Qwen3-4B-Instruction to investigate whether training on known, relatively easy-to-construct misbehavior datasets improves monitoring performance on unseen and more implicit misbehaviors. Our results highlight the challenges of reliable, scalable misbehavior monitoring and motivate future work on task-aware designing and training strategies for LLM-based monitors.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2601.05752

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Question AnsweringCode Generation

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Investigating CoT Monitorability in Large Reasoning Models

2025-11-11 · Shu Yang, Junchao Wu, Xilin Gong, Xuansheng Wu 외 arxiv

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on complex tasks by engaging in extended reasoning before producing final answers. Beyond improving abilities, these detailed reasoning traces also c…

Hodoscope: Unsupervised Monitoring for AI Misbehaviors

2026-04-13 · Ziqian Zhong, Shashwat Saxena, Aditi Raghunathan arxiv

Existing approaches to monitoring AI agents rely on supervised evaluation: human-written rules or LLM-based judges that check for known failure modes. However, novel misbehaviors may fall outside predefined categories en…

Reliable Weak-to-Strong Monitoring of LLM Agents

2025-08-26 · Neil Kale, Chen Bo Calvin Zhang, Kevin Zhu, Ankit Aich 외 arxiv

We stress test monitoring systems for detecting covert misbehavior in autonomous LLM agents (e.g., secretly sharing private information). To this end, we systematize a monitor red teaming (MRT) workflow that incorporates…

Adversarial RobustnessRed Teaming

LLMScan: Causal Scan for LLM Misbehavior Detection

2024-10-22 · Mengdi Zhang, Kai Kiat Goh, Peixin Zhang, Jun Sun 외

Despite the success of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various fields, their potential to generate untruthful, biased and harmful responses poses significant risks, particularly in critical applications. This highlig…

Causal Inference

Training on Documents About Monitoring Leads to CoT Obfuscation

2026-05-14 · Reilly Haskins, Bilal Chughtai, Joshua Engels arxiv

Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is one of the most promising tools we have for detecting model misbehavior, but its effectiveness depends on models faithfully externalizing their reasoning. Motivated by this vulnerabil…

Reinforcement Learning