AutoTestForge: A Multidimensional Automated Testing Framework for Natural Language Processing Models
In recent years, the application of behavioral testing in Natural Language Processing (NLP) model evaluation has experienced a remarkable and substantial growth. However, the existing methods continue to be restricted by the requirements for manual labor and the limited scope of capability assessment. To address these limitations, we introduce AutoTestForge, an automated and multidimensional testing framework for NLP models in this paper. Within AutoTestForge, through the utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically generate test templates and instantiate them, manual involvement is significantly reduced. Additionally, a mechanism for the validation of test case labels based on differential testing is implemented which makes use of a multi-model voting system to guarantee the quality of test cases. The framework also extends the test suite across three dimensions, taxonomy, fairness, and robustness, offering a comprehensive evaluation of the capabilities of NLP models. This expansion enables a more in-depth and thorough assessment of the models, providing valuable insights into their strengths and weaknesses. A comprehensive evaluation across sentiment analysis (SA) and semantic textual similarity (STS) tasks demonstrates that AutoTestForge consistently outperforms existing datasets and testing tools, achieving higher error detection rates (an average of $30.89\%$ for SA and $34.58\%$ for STS). Moreover, different generation strategies exhibit stable effectiveness, with error detection rates ranging from $29.03\% - 36.82\%$.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
FairnessSemantic Textual SimilaritySentiment AnalysisSTSSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A framework for paired-sample hypothesis testing for high-dimensional data
The standard paired-sample testing approach in the multidimensional setting applies multiple univariate tests on the individual features, followed by p-value adjustments. Such an approach suffers when the data carry nume…
Two-sample testingIntegration of cognitive tasks into artificial general intelligence test for large models
During the evolution of large models, performance evaluation is necessarily performed to assess their capabilities and ensure safety before practical application. However, current model evaluations mainly rely on specifi…
LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Texts
This paper introduces a framework for the automated evaluation of natural language texts. A manually constructed rubric describes how to assess multiple dimensions of interest. To evaluate a text, a large language model …
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelCounterfactual Situation Testing: From Single to Multidimensional Discrimination
We present counterfactual situation testing (CST), a causal data mining framework for detecting individual discrimination in a dataset of classifier decisions. CST answers the question "what would have been the model out…
AttributecounterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningFairnessPyResBugs: A Dataset of Residual Python Bugs for Natural Language-Driven Fault Injection
This paper presents PyResBugs, a curated dataset of residual bugs, i.e., defects that persist undetected during traditional testing but later surface in production, collected from major Python frameworks. Each bug in the…