AXCEL: Automated eXplainable Consistency Evaluation using LLMs
Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in both industry and academia for various tasks, yet evaluating the consistency of generated text responses continues to be a challenge. Traditional metrics like ROUGE and BLEU show a weak correlation with human judgment. More sophisticated metrics using Natural Language Inference (NLI) have shown improved correlations but are complex to implement, require domain-specific training due to poor cross-domain generalization, and lack explainability. More recently, prompt-based metrics using LLMs as evaluators have emerged; while they are easier to implement, they still lack explainability and depend on task-specific prompts, which limits their generalizability. This work introduces Automated eXplainable Consistency Evaluation using LLMs (AXCEL), a prompt-based consistency metric which offers explanations for the consistency scores by providing detailed reasoning and pinpointing inconsistent text spans. AXCEL is also a generalizable metric which can be adopted to multiple tasks without changing the prompt. AXCEL outperforms both non-prompt and prompt-based state-of-the-art (SOTA) metrics in detecting inconsistencies across summarization by 8.7%, free text generation by 6.2%, and data-to-text conversion tasks by 29.4%. We also evaluate the influence of underlying LLMs on prompt based metric performance and recalibrate the SOTA prompt-based metrics with the latest LLMs for fair comparison. Further, we show that AXCEL demonstrates strong performance using open source LLMs.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Domain GeneralizationNatural Language InferenceText GenerationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
AxCell: Automatic Extraction of Results from Machine Learning Papers
Tracking progress in machine learning has become increasingly difficult with the recent explosion in the number of papers. In this paper, we present AxCell, an automatic machine learning pipeline for extracting results f…
BIG-bench Machine LearningScientific Results ExtractionAn Automated Explainable Educational Assessment System Built on LLMs
In this demo, we present AERA Chat, an automated and explainable educational assessment system designed for interactive and visual evaluations of student responses. This system leverages large language models (LLMs) to g…
AERA Chat: An Interactive Platform for Automated Explainable Student Answer Assessment
Generating rationales that justify scoring decisions has emerged as a promising approach to enhance explainability in the development of automated scoring systems. However, the scarcity of publicly available rationale da…
ESGBench: A Benchmark for Explainable ESG Question Answering in Corporate Sustainability Reports
We present ESGBench, a benchmark dataset and evaluation framework designed to assess explainable ESG question answering systems using corporate sustainability reports. The benchmark consists of domain-grounded questions …
Question AnsweringCatching UX Flaws in Code: Leveraging LLMs to Identify Usability Flaws at the Development Stage
Usability evaluations are essential for ensuring that modern interfaces meet user needs, yet traditional heuristic evaluations by human experts can be time-consuming and subjective, especially early in development. This …