paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Before you <think>, monitor: Implementing Flavell's metacognitive framework in LLMs

2025-10-18 · Nick Oh arxiv

Current approaches to enhancing LLM reasoning follows two isolated paradigms: Monitor-Generate methods like Plan-and-Solve (Wang et al., 2023) and SELF-DISCOVER (Zhou et al., 2024) excel at strategic planning but lack mechanisms to verify whether selected strategies succeed; while Generate-Verify approaches like Self-Verification (Weng et al., 2022) and SELF-REFINE (Madaan et al., 2023) iteratively refine outputs but commence generation blindly without task assessment. This separation creates inefficiencies -- strategies fail without feedback, and refinement occurs without strategic grounding. We address this gap by implementing Flavell's cognitive monitoring model (1979) from the broader Monitor-Generate-Verify framework (Oh and Gobet, 2025), operationalising it as a three-phase iterative system. On GSM8K, preliminary results show 75.42% accuracy versus 68.44% for SELF-REFINE and 67.07% for Self-Verification, while requiring fewer attempts (1.3 vs 2.0) at 27-37% increased inference cost. These initial findings suggest upfront monitoring produces higher-quality initial solutions that reduce refinement needs, though evaluation beyond arithmetic reasoning is needed to establish generalisability.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.16374

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Arithmetic Reasoning

Results from the Paper

RankTaskDatasetModelMetrics
#86 Arithmetic Reasoning GSM8K Before you <think>, monitor: Implementin Accuracy: 75.42

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Monitor-Generate-Verify (MGV): Formalising Metacognitive Theory for Language Model Reasoning

2025-11-06 · Nick Oh, Fernand Gobet arxiv

Test-time reasoning architectures such as those following the Generate-Verify paradigm, where a model iteratively refines or verifies its own generated outputs, prioritise generation and verification but exclude the moni…

How Metacognitive Architectures Remember Their Own Thoughts: A Systematic Review

2025-02-28 · Robin Nolte, Mihai Pomarlan, Ayden Janssen, Daniel Beßler 외

Inspired by human cognition, metacognition has gained significant attention for its potential to enhance autonomy, adaptability, and robust learning in artificial agents. Yet research on Computational Metacognitive Archi…

The Metacognitive Probe: Five Behavioural Calibration Diagnostics for LLMs

2026-05-11 · Rafael C. T. Oliveira arxiv

The Metacognitive Probe is an exploratory five-task, 15-slot diagnostic that decomposes an LLM's confidence behaviour into five behaviourally-distinct dimensions: confidence calibration (T1-CC), epistemic vigilance (T2-E…

Metacognitive Self-Correction for Multi-Agent System via Prototype-Guided Next-Execution Reconstruction

2025-10-16 · Xu Shen, Qi Zhang, Song Wang, Zhen Tan 외 arxiv

Large Language Model based multi-agent systems (MAS) excel at collaborative problem solving but remain brittle to cascading errors: a single faulty step can propagate across agents and disrupt the trajectory. In this pap…

What Is Going through Your Mind? Metacognitive Events Classification in Human-Agent Interactions

2022-06-01 · ISA (LREC) 2022 6 · Hafiza Erum Manzoor, Volha Petukhova

For an agent, either human or artificial, to show intelligent interactive behaviour implies assessments of the reliability of own and others’ thoughts, feelings and beliefs. Agents capable of these robust evaluations are…

Decision Makingvalid