paper-with-me

Papers

Benchmarking Algorithmic Bias in Face Recognition: An Experimental Approach Using Synthetic Faces and Human Evaluation

2023-08-10 · ICCV 2023 1 · Hao Liang, Pietro Perona, Guha Balakrishnan

We propose an experimental method for measuring bias in face recognition systems. Existing methods to measure bias depend on benchmark datasets that are collected in the wild and annotated for protected (e.g., race, gender) and non-protected (e.g., pose, lighting) attributes. Such observational datasets only permit correlational conclusions, e.g., "Algorithm A's accuracy is different on female and male faces in dataset X.". By contrast, experimental methods manipulate attributes individually and thus permit causal conclusions, e.g., "Algorithm A's accuracy is affected by gender and skin color." Our method is based on generating synthetic faces using a neural face generator, where each attribute of interest is modified independently while leaving all other attributes constant. Human observers crucially provide the ground truth on perceptual identity similarity between synthetic image pairs. We validate our method quantitatively by evaluating race and gender biases of three research-grade face recognition models. Our synthetic pipeline reveals that for these algorithms, accuracy is lower for Black and East Asian population subgroups. Our method can also quantify how perceptual changes in attributes affect face identity distances reported by these models. Our large synthetic dataset, consisting of 48,000 synthetic face image pairs (10,200 unique synthetic faces) and 555,000 human annotations (individual attributes and pairwise identity comparisons) is available to researchers in this important area.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2308.05441

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

AttributeBenchmarkingFace Recognition

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Towards causal benchmarking of bias in face analysis algorithms

2020-07-13 · ECCV 2020 8 · Guha Balakrishnan, Yuanjun Xiong, Wei Xia, Pietro Perona

Measuring algorithmic bias is crucial both to assess algorithmic fairness, and to guide the improvement of algorithms. Current methods to measure algorithmic bias in computer vision, which are based on observational data…

AttributeBenchmarkingFairnessGender Classification

SensitiveLoss: Improving Accuracy and Fairness of Face Representations with Discrimination-Aware Deep Learning

2020-04-22 · Ignacio Serna, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Manuel Cebrian 외

We propose a discrimination-aware learning method to improve both accuracy and fairness of biased face recognition algorithms. The most popular face recognition benchmarks assume a distribution of subjects without paying…

Face RecognitionFairnessTriplet

Second Edition FRCSyn Challenge at CVPR 2024: Face Recognition Challenge in the Era of Synthetic Data

2024-04-16 · Ivan DeAndres-Tame, Ruben Tolosana, Pietro Melzi, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez 외

Synthetic data is gaining increasing relevance for training machine learning models. This is mainly motivated due to several factors such as the lack of real data and intra-class variability, time and errors produced in …

BenchmarkingFace RecognitionSynthetic Face Recognition

Algorithmic Discrimination: Formulation and Exploration in Deep Learning-based Face Biometrics

2019-12-04 · Ignacio Serna, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Manuel Cebrian 외

The most popular face recognition benchmarks assume a distribution of subjects without much attention to their demographic attributes. In this work, we perform a comprehensive discrimination-aware experimentation of deep…

Deep LearningFace Recognition

Information-Theoretic Bias Reduction via Causal View of Spurious Correlation

2022-01-10 · Seonguk Seo, Joon-Young Lee, Bohyung Han

We propose an information-theoretic bias measurement technique through a causal interpretation of spurious correlation, which is effective to identify the feature-level algorithmic bias by taking advantage of conditional…

Face RecognitionFairness