Beneficial Perturbations Network for Defending Adversarial Examples
Deep neural networks can be fooled by adversarial attacks: adding carefully computed small adversarial perturbations to clean inputs can cause misclassification on state-of-the-art machine learning models. The reason is that neural networks fail to accommodate the distribution drift of the input data caused by adversarial perturbations. Here, we present a new solution - Beneficial Perturbation Network (BPN) - to defend against adversarial attacks by fixing the distribution drift. During training, BPN generates and leverages beneficial perturbations (somewhat opposite to well-known adversarial perturbations) by adding new, out-of-network biasing units. Biasing units influence the parameter space of the network, to preempt and neutralize future adversarial perturbations on input data samples. To achieve this, BPN creates reverse adversarial attacks during training, with very little cost, by recycling the training gradients already computed. Reverse attacks are captured by the biasing units, and the biases can in turn effectively defend against future adversarial examples. Reverse attacks are a shortcut, i.e., they affect the network's parameters without requiring instantiation of adversarial examples that could assist training. We provide comprehensive empirical evidence showing that 1) BPN is robust to adversarial examples and is much more running memory and computationally efficient compared to classical adversarial training. 2) BPN can defend against adversarial examples with negligible additional computation and parameter costs compared to training only on clean examples; 3) BPN hurts the accuracy on clean examples much less than classic adversarial training; 4) BPN can improve the generalization of the network 5) BPN trained only with Fast Gradient Sign Attack can generalize to defend PGD attacks.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Defending against Adversarial Attack towards Deep Neural Networks via Collaborative Multi-task Training
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples which contain human-imperceptible perturbations. A series of defending methods, either proactive defence or reactive defence, have been propo…
Adversarial AttackTowards Defending Multiple $\ell_p$-norm Bounded Adversarial Perturbations via Gated Batch Normalization
There has been extensive evidence demonstrating that deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which motivates the development of defenses against adversarial attacks. Existing adversarial defenses typ…
MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examples
Deep learning has shown promising results on hard perceptual problems in recent years. However, deep learning systems are found to be vulnerable to small adversarial perturbations that are nearly imperceptible to human. …
Deep LearningVocal Bursts Valence PredictionDynamically Computing Adversarial Perturbations for Recurrent Neural Networks
Convolutional and recurrent neural networks have been widely employed to achieve state-of-the-art performance on classification tasks. However, it has also been noted that these networks can be manipulated adversarially …
MAPE: Defending Against Transferable Adversarial Attacks Using Multi-Source Adversarial Perturbations Elimination
Neural networks are vulnerable to meticulously crafted adversarial examples, leading to high-confidence misclassifications in image classification tasks. Due to their consistency with regular input patterns and the absen…
Image Classification