paper-with-me

Papers

Beyond Bias and Compliance: Towards Individual Agency and Plurality of Ethics in AI

2023-02-23 · Thomas Krendl Gilbert, Megan Welle Brozek, Andrew Brozek

AI ethics is an emerging field with multiple, competing narratives about how to best solve the problem of building human values into machines. Two major approaches are focused on bias and compliance, respectively. But neither of these ideas fully encompasses ethics: using moral principles to decide how to act in a particular situation. Our method posits that the way data is labeled plays an essential role in the way AI behaves, and therefore in the ethics of machines themselves. The argument combines a fundamental insight from ethics (i.e. that ethics is about values) with our practical experience building and scaling machine learning systems. We want to build AI that is actually ethical by first addressing foundational concerns: how to build good systems, how to define what is good in relation to system architecture, and who should provide that definition. Building ethical AI creates a foundation of trust between a company and the users of that platform. But this trust is unjustified unless users experience the direct value of ethical AI. Until users have real control over how algorithms behave, something is missing in current AI solutions. This causes massive distrust in AI, and apathy towards AI ethics solutions. The scope of this paper is to propose an alternative path that allows for the plurality of values and the freedom of individual expression. Both are essential for realizing true moral character.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2302.12149

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Ethics

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Autonomy and Agency in Agentic AI: Architectural Tactics for Regulated Contexts

2026-05-12 · Damir Safin, Dian Balta arxiv

Deploying agentic AI in regulated contexts requires principled reasoning about two design dimensions: agency (what the system can do) and autonomy (how much it acts without human involvement). Though often treated indepe…

White Men Lead, Black Women Help? Benchmarking and Mitigating Language Agency Social Biases in LLMs

2024-04-16 · Yixin Wan, Kai-Wei Chang

Social biases can manifest in language agency. However, very limited research has investigated such biases in Large Language Model (LLM)-generated content. In addition, previous works often rely on string-matching techni…

BenchmarkingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelSentence+1

"I'm" Lost in Translation: Pronoun Missteps in Crowdsourced Data Sets

2023-04-22 · Katie Seaborn, Yeongdae Kim

As virtual assistants continue to be taken up globally, there is an ever-greater need for these speech-based systems to communicate naturally in a variety of languages. Crowdsourcing initiatives have focused on multiling…

Translation

Mill's canons meet social ranking: A characterization of plurality

2025-05-15 · Takahiro Suzuki, Michele Aleandri, Stefano Moretti

In his book entitled ''A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive'' (1843), John Stuart Mill proposed principles of inductive reasoning in the form of five canons. To date, these canons are classic methods for causal…

Manipulation of positional social choice correspondences under incomplete information

2025-03-29 · Raffaele Berzi, Daniela Bubboloni, Michele Gori

We study the manipulability of social choice correspondences in situations where individuals have incomplete information about others' preferences. We propose a general concept of manipulability that depends on the exten…