Beyond Holistic Scores: Automatic Trait-Based Quality Scoring of Argumentative Essays
Automated Essay Scoring systems have traditionally focused on holistic scores, limiting their pedagogical usefulness, especially in the case of complex essay genres such as argumentative writing. In educational contexts, teachers and learners require interpretable, trait-level feedback that aligns with instructional goals and established rubrics. In this paper, we study trait-based Automatic Argumentative Essay Scoring using two complementary modeling paradigms designed for realistic educational deployment: (1) structured in-context learning with small open-source LLMs, and (2) a supervised, encoder-based BigBird model with a CORAL-style ordinal regression formulation, optimized for long-sequence understanding. We conduct a systematic evaluation on the ASAP++ dataset, which includes essay scores across five quality traits, offering strong coverage of core argumentation dimensions. LLMs are prompted with designed, rubric-aligned in-context examples, along with feedback and confidence requests, while we explicitly model ordinality in scores with the BigBird model via the rank-consistent CORAL framework. Our results show that explicitly modeling score ordinality substantially improves agreement with human raters across all traits, outperforming LLMs and nominal classification and regression-based baselines. This finding reinforces the importance of aligning model objectives with rubric semantics for educational assessment. At the same time, small open-source LLMs achieve a competitive performance without task-specific fine-tuning, particularly for reasoning-oriented traits, while enabling transparent, privacy-preserving, and locally deployable assessment scenarios. Our findings provide methodological, modeling, and practical insights for the design of AI-based educational systems that aim to deliver interpretable, rubric-aligned feedback for argumentative writing.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Automated Essay ScoringSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A Unified Framework to Elicit Structured Feedback for Interpretable Multi-Trait Essay Scoring
Multi-trait Automated Essay Scoring (AES) requires rubric-grounded reasoning across interdependent traits, rather than isolated score prediction. Existing feedback-enhanced methods often decouple feedback from scoring or…
Automated Essay ScoringMany Hands Make Light Work: Using Essay Traits to Automatically Score Essays
Most research in the area of automatic essay grading (AEG) is geared towards scoring the essay holistically while there has also been some work done on scoring individual essay traits. In this paper, we describe a way to…
Automated Essay ScoringMulti-Task LearningTRATES: Trait-Specific Rubric-Assisted Cross-Prompt Essay Scoring
Research on holistic Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is long-dated; yet, there is a notable lack of attention for assessing essays according to individual traits. In this work, we propose TRATES, a novel trait-specific and…
Automated Essay ScoringLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelICLE++: Modeling Fine-Grained Traits for Holistic Essay Scoring
The majority of the recently-developed models for automated essay scoring (AES) are evaluated solely on the ASAP corpus. However, ASAP is not without its limitations. For instance, it is not clear whether models trained …
Automated Essay ScoringCRACQ: A Multi-Dimensional Approach To Automated Document Assessment
This paper presents CRACQ, a multi-dimensional evaluation framework tailored to evaluate documents across f i v e specific traits: Coherence, Rigor, Appropriateness, Completeness, and Quality. Building on insights from t…
Automated Essay Scoring