paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Beyond Solver Verdicts: Generative Reward Models for Autoformalization

2026-09-10 · Vikash Singh, Debargha Ganguly, Aman Goel, Ali Torkamani, Xiaoxue Han, Joseph Lilien, Ferhat Erata, Vipin Chaudhary hf

Neurosymbolic systems rely on mathematical solvers to guarantee reasoning correctness, yet solvers are fundamentally blind to whether a formal translation maintains strict reference-equivalence to a designated formalization. We formalize this vulnerability as Verdict-Preserving-Unfaithfulness (VPU): a failure mode where an incorrect encoding executes successfully and matches the expected verdict. We theoretically prove that structural, verdict-only verification heuristics are mathematically bounded to chance-level detection on these deceptively valid traces. To resolve this, we introduce Generative Verification (GenV), which distills an offline Z3-equivalence oracle into a reference-free, continuous reference-equivalence score by repurposing the language model's native vocabulary space. Mechanistic analysis via decision-projected logit lenses and sparse autoencoders shows this generative readout natively extracts precise spatial error coordinates without explicit localization training. Empirically, our oracle-mined verifier (GenV+HN) achieves 0.961 AUROC in reference-equivalence verification, generalizes zero-shot across unseen translators and divergent formal styles, and yields an 11.3-point downstream accuracy gain in agentic test-time compute allocation.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2609.11085

Code (2)

arxivsub/arXivSub_daily_arxiv ★ 4
grrlkk/writing-agent-arxiv-daily

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

FormalRx: Rectify and eXamine Semantic Failures in Autoformalization

2026-07-06 · Haocheng Wang, Baiyu Huang, Yingjia Wan, Xiao Zhu 외 arxiv

The veracious semantic alignment in autoformalization is significant for formal mathematical reasoning. However, existing evaluations provide only opaque binary verdicts or scalar scores, offering no interpretable insigh…

Mathematical Reasoning

Small Language Models as Judges for Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning

2026-08-30 · Fengyu Xie, Yilun Zhao, Bingsen Chen, Arman Cohan 외 hf

Rubric-based reinforcement learning extends RL beyond tasks with exact answers or rule-based verifiers by scoring responses against instance-specific criteria. However, this makes reward computation expensive: training r…

Reinforcement Learning

Verifiable Geometry Problem Solving: Solver-Driven Autoformalization and Theorem Proposing

2026-06-26 · Can Li, Ting Zhang, Junbo Zhao, Hua Huang arxiv

Geometry Problem Solving have increasingly adopt the neuro-symbolic paradigm, combining neural intuition with symbolic rigor. However, current frameworks suffer from severe bottlenecks in two core stages: autoformalizati…

Reinforcement Learning

The Faithfulness Gap: Certifying Semantic Equivalence Between Natural-Language and Formal Mathematical Statements

2026-06-15 · Noor Islam S. Mohammad, Tamim Sheikh arxiv

Autoformalization, translating natural-language mathematics into formal proof assistants, is bottlenecked not by translation fluency but by \emph{faithfulness}: a formal statement can typecheck and be provable, yet still…

Autoformalization of Game Descriptions using Large Language Models

2024-09-18 · Agnieszka Mensfelt, Kostas Stathis, Vince Trencsenyi

Game theory is a powerful framework for reasoning about strategic interactions, with applications in domains ranging from day-to-day life to international politics. However, applying formal reasoning tools in such contex…

Formal Logic