paper-with-me

Papers

Bipolar in Temporal Argumentation Framework

2019-03-05 · Maximiliano C. D. Budán, Maria Laura Cobo, Diego C. Martinez, Guillermo R. Simari

A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration in a given period of time, called availability intervals, which are defined for every individual argument. The original proposal is based on a single, abstract notion of attack between arguments that remains static and permanent in time. Thus, in general, when identifying the set of acceptable arguments, the outcome associated with a TAF will vary over time. In this work we introduce an extension of TAF adding the capability of modeling a support relation between arguments. In this sense, the resulting framework provides a suitable model for different time-dependent issues. Thus, the main contribution here is to provide an enhanced framework for modeling a positive (support) and negative (attack) interaction varying over time, which are relevant in many real-world situations. This leads to a Timed Bipolar Argumentation Framework (T-BAF), where classical argument extensions can be defined. The proposal aims at advancing in the integration of temporal argumentation in different application domain.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1903.01874

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

valid

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Complexity Results and Algorithms for Bipolar Argumentation

2019-03-05 · Amin Karamlou, Kristijonas Čyras, Francesca Toni

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs) admit several interpretations of the support relation and diverging definitions of semantics. Recently, several classes of BAFs have been captured as instances of bipolar Assumptio…

Aggregating Bipolar Opinions (With Appendix)

2021-02-04 · Stefan Lauren, Francesco Belardinelli, Francesca Toni

We introduce a novel method to aggregate Bipolar Argumentation (BA) Frameworks expressing opinions by different parties in debates. We use Bipolar Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) as an all-encompassing formalism for…

Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Support-Relations of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

2021-06-22 · Weiwei Chen

In many real-life situations that involve exchanges of arguments, individuals may differ on their assessment of which supports between the arguments are in fact justified, i.e., they put forward different support-relatio…

Splitting Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks and Supports

2026-04-30 · Matti Berthold, Lydia Blümel, Giovanni Buraglio, Anna Rapberger arxiv

This work proposes novel splitting techniques for argumentation formalisms that incorporate supports between defeasible elements. We base our studies on bipolar set-based argumentation frameworks (BSAFs) which generalize…

On Gradual Semantics for Assumption-Based Argumentation

2025-07-14 · Anna Rapberger, Fabrizio Russo, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni

In computational argumentation, gradual semantics are fine-grained alternatives to extension-based and labelling-based semantics . They ascribe a dialectical strength to (components of) arguments sanctioning their degree…