paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Breaking Determinism: Stochastic Modeling for Reliable Off-Policy Evaluation in Ad Auctions

2025-12-03 · Hongseon Yeom, Jaeyoul Shin, Soojin Min, Jeongmin Yoon, Seunghak Yu, Dongyeop Kang arxiv

Online A/B testing, the gold standard for evaluating new advertising policies, consumes substantial engineering resources and risks significant revenue loss from deploying underperforming variations. This motivates the use of Off-Policy Evaluation (OPE) for rapid, offline assessment. However, applying OPE to ad auctions is fundamentally more challenging than in domains like recommender systems, where stochastic policies are common. In online ad auctions, it is common for the highest-bidding ad to win the impression, resulting in a deterministic, winner-takes-all setting. This results in zero probability of exposure for non-winning ads, rendering standard OPE estimators inapplicable. We introduce the first principled framework for OPE in deterministic auctions by repurposing the bid landscape model to approximate the propensity score. This model allows us to derive robust approximate propensity scores, enabling the use of stable estimators like Self-Normalized Inverse Propensity Scoring (SNIPS) for counterfactual evaluation. We validate our approach on the AuctionNet simulation benchmark and against 2-weeks online A/B test from a large-scale industrial platform. Our method shows remarkable alignment with online results, achieving a 92\% Mean Directional Accuracy (MDA) in CTR prediction, significantly outperforming the parametric baseline. MDA is the most critical metric for guiding deployment decisions, as it reflects the ability to correctly predict whether a new model will improve or harm performance. This work contributes the first practical and validated framework for reliable OPE in deterministic auction environments, offering an efficient alternative to costly and risky online experiments.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2512.03354

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Geometry and Determinism of Optimal Stationary Control in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes

2015-03-24 · Guido Montufar, Keyan Ghazi-Zahedi, Nihat Ay

It is well known that for any finite state Markov decision process (MDP) there is a memoryless deterministic policy that maximizes the expected reward. For partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs), optimal…

Dynamic Entropy Tuning in Reinforcement Learning Low-Level Quadcopter Control: Stochasticity vs Determinism

2025-12-20 · Youssef Mahran, Zeyad Gamal, Ayman El-Badawy arxiv

This paper explores the impact of dynamic entropy tuning in Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms that train a stochastic policy. Its performance is compared against algorithms that train a deterministic one. Stochastic…

Reinforcement Learning

On the Theory of Stochastic Automata

2021-03-26 · Merve Nur Cakir, Mehwish Saleemi, Karl-Heinz Zimmermann

The theory of discrete stochastic systems has been initiated by the work of Shannon and von Neumann. While Shannon has considered memory-less communication channels and their generalization by introducing states, von Neu…

Good-for-MDP State Reduction for Stochastic LTL Planning

2025-11-12 · Christoph Weinhuber, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Yong Li, Sven Schewe 외 arxiv

We study stochastic planning problems in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with goals specified in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). The state-of-the-art approach transforms LTL formulas into good-for-MDP (GFM) automata, which…

Non-Determinism and the Lawlessness of Machine Learning Code

2022-06-23 · A. Feder Cooper, Jonathan Frankle, Christopher De Sa

Legal literature on machine learning (ML) tends to focus on harms, and thus tends to reason about individual model outcomes and summary error rates. This focus has masked important aspects of ML that are rooted in its re…

Legal Reasoning