Bridging Video Quality Scoring and Justification via Large Multimodal Models
Classical video quality assessment (VQA) methods generate a numerical score to judge a video's perceived visual fidelity and clarity. Yet, a score fails to describe the video's complex quality dimensions, restricting its applicability. Benefiting from the linguistic output, adapting video large multimodal models (LMMs) to VQA via instruction tuning has the potential to address this issue. The core of the approach lies in the video quality-centric instruction data. Previous explorations mainly focus on the image domain, and their data generation processes heavily rely on human quality annotations and proprietary systems, limiting data scalability and effectiveness. To address these challenges, we propose the Score-based Instruction Generation (SIG) pipeline. Specifically, SIG first scores multiple quality dimensions of an unlabeled video and maps scores to text-defined levels. It then explicitly incorporates a hierarchical Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to model the correlation between specific dimensions and overall quality, mimicking the human visual system's reasoning process. The automated pipeline eliminates the reliance on expert-written quality descriptions and proprietary systems, ensuring data scalability and generation efficiency. To this end, the resulting Score2Instruct (S2I) dataset contains over 320K diverse instruction-response pairs, laying the basis for instruction tuning. Moreover, to advance video LMMs' quality scoring and justification abilities simultaneously, we devise a progressive tuning strategy to fully unleash the power of S2I. Built upon SIG, we further curate a benchmark termed S2I-Bench with 400 open-ended questions to better evaluate the quality justification capacity of video LMMs. Experimental results on the S2I-Bench and existing benchmarks indicate that our method consistently improves quality scoring and justification capabilities across multiple video LMMs.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Video Quality AssessmentVisual Question Answering (VQA)Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Q-Save: Towards Scoring and Attribution for Generated Video Evaluation
Evaluating AI-generated video (AIGV) quality hinges on three crucial dimensions: visual quality, dynamic quality, and text-video alignment. While numerous evaluation datasets and algorithms have been proposed, existing a…
Video AlignmentIntelliProof: An Argumentation Network-based Conversational Helper for Organized Reflection
We present IntelliProof, an interactive system for analyzing argumentative essays through LLMs. IntelliProof structures an essay as an argumentation graph, where claims are represented as nodes, supporting evidence is at…
Automated Essay ScoringAnalytic Score Prediction and Justification Identification in Automated Short Answer Scoring
This paper provides an analytical assessment of student short answer responses with a view to potential benefits in pedagogical contexts. We first propose and formalize two novel analytical assessment tasks: analytic sco…
VQA$^2$: Visual Question Answering for Video Quality Assessment
The advent and proliferation of large multi-modal models (LMMs) have introduced new paradigms to computer vision, transforming various tasks into a unified visual question answering framework. Video Quality Assessment (V…
Question AnsweringVideo Quality AssessmentVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)Automatic scoring of short answers using justification cues estimated by BERT
Automated scoring technology for short-answer questions has been attracting attention to improve the fairness of scoring and reduce the burden on the scorer. In general, a large amount of data is required to train an aut…
Fairness