paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Bringing legal knowledge to the public by constructing a legal question bank using large-scale pre-trained language model

2025-05-07 · Mingruo Yuan, Ben Kao, Tien-Hsuan Wu, Michael M. K. Cheung, Henry W. H. Chan, Anne S. Y. Cheung, Felix W. H. Chan, Yongxi Chen

Access to legal information is fundamental to access to justice. Yet accessibility refers not only to making legal documents available to the public, but also rendering legal information comprehensible to them. A vexing problem in bringing legal information to the public is how to turn formal legal documents such as legislation and judgments, which are often highly technical, to easily navigable and comprehensible knowledge to those without legal education. In this study, we formulate a three-step approach for bringing legal knowledge to laypersons, tackling the issues of navigability and comprehensibility. First, we translate selected sections of the law into snippets (called CLIC-pages), each being a small piece of article that focuses on explaining certain technical legal concept in layperson's terms. Second, we construct a Legal Question Bank (LQB), which is a collection of legal questions whose answers can be found in the CLIC-pages. Third, we design an interactive CLIC Recommender (CRec). Given a user's verbal description of a legal situation that requires a legal solution, CRec interprets the user's input and shortlists questions from the question bank that are most likely relevant to the given legal situation and recommends their corresponding CLIC pages where relevant legal knowledge can be found. In this paper we focus on the technical aspects of creating an LQB. We show how large-scale pre-trained language models, such as GPT-3, can be used to generate legal questions. We compare machine-generated questions (MGQs) against human-composed questions (HCQs) and find that MGQs are more scalable, cost-effective, and more diversified, while HCQs are more precise. We also show a prototype of CRec and illustrate through an example how our 3-step approach effectively brings relevant legal knowledge to the public.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2505.04132

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Refunds@Expedia|||How do I get a full refund from Expedia? “How do I get a full refund from Expedia? How do I get a full refund from Expedia? – Call ☎️ +1-(888) 829 (0881) or +1-805-330-4056 or +1-805-330-4056 for Quick Help &…
{Dispute@FaQ-s}How to file a dispute with Expedia? How to file a dispute with Expedia? To file a complaint against Expedia, first try contacting their customer service directly. You can reach them by phone at…
BPE Byte Pair Encoding, or BPE, is a subword segmentation algorithm that encodes rare and unknown words as sequences of subword units. The intuition is that various word…
Attention Dropout Attention Dropout is a type of dropout used in attention-based architectures, where elements are randomly dropped out of the…
Softmax The Softmax output function transforms a previous layer's output into a vector of probabilities. It is commonly used for multiclass classification. Given an input vector $x$…
Residual Connection 설명 없음
Linear Layer A Linear Layer is a projection $\mathbf{XW + b}$.
Multi-Head Attention 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Unlocking Legal Knowledge: A Multilingual Dataset for Judicial Summarization in Switzerland

2024-10-17 · Luca Rolshoven, Vishvaksenan Rasiah, Srinanda Brügger Bose, Matthias Stürmer 외

Legal research is a time-consuming task that most lawyers face on a daily basis. A large part of legal research entails looking up relevant caselaw and bringing it in relation to the case at hand. Lawyers heavily rely on…

Constructing A Dataset of Support and Attack Relations in Legal Arguments in Court Judgements using Linguistic Rules

2022-06-01 · LREC 2022 6 · Basit Ali, Sachin Pawar, Girish Palshikar, Rituraj Singh

Argumentation mining is a growing area of research and has several interesting practical applications of mining legal arguments. Support and Attack relations are the backbone of any legal argument. However, there is no p…

SentenceSentence-Pair Classification

Constructing a Knowledge Graph for Vietnamese Legal Cases with Heterogeneous Graphs

2023-09-16 · Thi-Hai-Yen Vuong, Minh-Quan Hoang, Tan-Minh Nguyen, Hoang-Trung Nguyen 외

This paper presents a knowledge graph construction method for legal case documents and related laws, aiming to organize legal information efficiently and enhance various downstream tasks. Our approach consists of three m…

graph construction

Capturing Legal Reasoning Paths from Facts to Law in Court Judgments using Knowledge Graphs

2025-08-24 · Ryoma Kondo, Riona Matsuoka, Takahiro Yoshida, Kazuyuki Yamasawa 외 arxiv

Court judgments reveal how legal rules have been interpreted and applied to facts, providing a foundation for understanding structured legal reasoning. However, existing automated approaches for capturing legal reasoning…

Knowledge GraphsLegal Reasoning

AI Legal Companion: Enhancing Access to Justice and Legal Literacy for the Public

2024-11-19 · International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) 2024 11 · Donny Kurniawan, Siti Elda Hiererra

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the importance of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into the legal sector to address the challenge of legal complexity and initiating the development of customized AI …

MisinformationRAGRetrieval-augmented Generation