Building Trust in Mental Health Chatbots: Safety Metrics and LLM-Based Evaluation Tools
Objective: This study aims to develop and validate an evaluation framework to ensure the safety and reliability of mental health chatbots, which are increasingly popular due to their accessibility, human-like interactions, and context-aware support. Materials and Methods: We created an evaluation framework with 100 benchmark questions and ideal responses, and five guideline questions for chatbot responses. This framework, validated by mental health experts, was tested on a GPT-3.5-turbo-based chatbot. Automated evaluation methods explored included large language model (LLM)-based scoring, an agentic approach using real-time data, and embedding models to compare chatbot responses against ground truth standards. Results: The results highlight the importance of guidelines and ground truth for improving LLM evaluation accuracy. The agentic method, dynamically accessing reliable information, demonstrated the best alignment with human assessments. Adherence to a standardized, expert-validated framework significantly enhanced chatbot response safety and reliability. Discussion: Our findings emphasize the need for comprehensive, expert-tailored safety evaluation metrics for mental health chatbots. While LLMs have significant potential, careful implementation is necessary to mitigate risks. The superior performance of the agentic approach underscores the importance of real-time data access in enhancing chatbot reliability. Conclusion: The study validated an evaluation framework for mental health chatbots, proving its effectiveness in improving safety and reliability. Future work should extend evaluations to accuracy, bias, empathy, and privacy to ensure holistic assessment and responsible integration into healthcare. Standardized evaluations will build trust among users and professionals, facilitating broader adoption and improved mental health support through technology.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
ChatbotLarge Language ModelMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Trust Stack for Mental Health AI: A Survey of Calibration across Human, Interaction, and AI Layers
Language-based AI is increasingly deployed for mental health support, yet trust is evaluated in interdisciplinary but operationally misaligned ways: NLP and AI work measures robustness, safety, privacy, and explanations,…
A Checklist for Trustworthy, Safe, and User-Friendly Mental Health Chatbots
Mental health concerns are rising globally, prompting increased reliance on technology to address the demand-supply gap in mental health services. In particular, mental health chatbots are emerging as a promising solutio…
SafeChat: A Framework for Building Trustworthy Collaborative Assistants and a Case Study of its Usefulness
Collaborative assistants, or chatbots, are data-driven decision support systems that enable natural interaction for task completion. While they can meet critical needs in modern society, concerns about their reliability …
ChatbotExtractive SummarizationInformation RetrievalLarge Language Model+1Domain-Specific Constitutional AI: Enhancing Safety in LLM-Powered Mental Health Chatbots
Mental health applications have emerged as a critical area in computational health, driven by rising global rates of mental illness, the integration of AI in psychological care, and the need for scalable solutions in und…
Assistive Chatbots for healthcare: a succinct review
Artificial Intelligence (AI) for supporting healthcare services has never been more necessitated than by the recent global pandemic. Here, we review the state-of-the-art in AI-enabled Chatbots in healthcare proposed duri…
ChatbotEthics