paper-with-me

Papers

CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Prediction

2018-07-04 · Chaojun Xiao, Haoxi Zhong, Zhipeng Guo, Cunchao Tu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yansong Feng, Xianpei Han, Zhen Hu, Heng Wang, Jianfeng Xu

In this paper, we introduce the \textbf{C}hinese \textbf{AI} and \textbf{L}aw challenge dataset (CAIL2018), the first large-scale Chinese legal dataset for judgment prediction. \dataset contains more than $2.6$ million criminal cases published by the Supreme People's Court of China, which are several times larger than other datasets in existing works on judgment prediction. Moreover, the annotations of judgment results are more detailed and rich. It consists of applicable law articles, charges, and prison terms, which are expected to be inferred according to the fact descriptions of cases. For comparison, we implement several conventional text classification baselines for judgment prediction and experimental results show that it is still a challenge for current models to predict the judgment results of legal cases, especially on prison terms. To help the researchers make improvements on legal judgment prediction, both \dataset and baselines will be released after the CAIL competition\footnote{http://cail.cipsc.org.cn/}.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1807.02478

Code (3)

brightmart/ai_law tf
china-ai-law-challenge/CAIL
china-ai-law-challenge/cail2018 tf

Tasks

ArticlesPredictionText Classification

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Overview of CAIL2018: Legal Judgment Prediction Competition

2018-10-13 · Haoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Zhipeng Guo, Cunchao Tu 외

In this paper, we give an overview of the Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) competition at Chinese AI and Law challenge (CAIL2018). This competition focuses on LJP which aims to predict the judgment results according to th…

ArticlesPrediction

Legal Syllogism Prompting: Teaching Large Language Models for Legal Judgment Prediction

2023-07-17 · Cong Jiang, Xiaolei Yang

Legal syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning commonly used by legal professionals to analyze cases. In this paper, we propose legal syllogism prompting (LoT), a simple prompting method to teach large language models …

Articles

SEMDR: A Semantic-Aware Dual Encoder Model for Legal Judgment Prediction with Legal Clue Tracing

2024-08-19 · Pengjie Liu, Wang Zhang, Yulong Ding, Xuefeng Zhang 외

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) aims to form legal judgments based on the criminal fact description. However, researchers struggle to classify confusing criminal cases, such as robbery and theft, which requires LJP model…

Representation LearningSentence

VERDICT: Verifiable Evolving Reasoning with Directive-Informed Collegial Teams for Legal Judgment Prediction

2026-03-13 · Hui Liao, Chuan Qin, Yongwen Ren, Hao Li 외 arxiv

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) predicts applicable law articles, charges, and penalty terms from case facts. Beyond accuracy, LJP calls for intrinsically interpretable and legally grounded reasoning that can reconcile s…

Continual Learning

LegalDuet: Learning Fine-grained Representations for Legal Judgment Prediction via a Dual-View Contrastive Learning

2024-01-27 · Buqiang Xu, Xin Dai, Zhenghao Liu, Huiyuan Xie 외

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is a fundamental task of legal artificial intelligence, aiming to automatically predict the judgment outcomes of legal cases. Existing LJP models primarily focus on identifying legal trigg…

Contrastive Learning