paper-with-me

Papers

Calculus of Consent via MARL: Legitimating the Collaborative Governance Supplying Public Goods

2021-11-20 · Yang Hu, Zhui Zhu, Sirui Song, Xue Liu, Yang Yu

Public policies that supply public goods, especially those involve collaboration by limiting individual liberty, always give rise to controversies over governance legitimacy. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) methods are appropriate for supporting the legitimacy of the public policies that supply public goods at the cost of individual interests. Among these policies, the inter-regional collaborative pandemic control is a prominent example, which has become much more important for an increasingly inter-connected world facing a global pandemic like COVID-19. Different patterns of collaborative strategies have been observed among different systems of regions, yet it lacks an analytical process to reason for the legitimacy of those strategies. In this paper, we use the inter-regional collaboration for pandemic control as an example to demonstrate the necessity of MARL in reasoning, and thereby legitimizing policies enforcing such inter-regional collaboration. Experimental results in an exemplary environment show that our MARL approach is able to demonstrate the effectiveness and necessity of restrictions on individual liberty for collaborative supply of public goods. Different optimal policies are learned by our MARL agents under different collaboration levels, which change in an interpretable pattern of collaboration that helps to balance the losses suffered by regions of different types, and consequently promotes the overall welfare. Meanwhile, policies learned with higher collaboration levels yield higher global rewards, which illustrates the benefit of, and thus provides a novel justification for the legitimacy of, promoting inter-regional collaboration. Therefore, our method shows the capability of MARL in computationally modeling and supporting the theory of calculus of consent, developed by Nobel Prize winner J. M. Buchanan.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2111.10627

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Calculus of Consent via MARL: Legitimating the Collaborative Governance Supplying Public Goods

2021-10-12 · NeurIPS Workshop PERLS 2021 12 · Anonymous

Public policies that supply public goods, especially those involve collaboration by limiting individual liberty, always give rise to controversies over governance legitimacy. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) met…

Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

Consent Chain Degradation in Embodied Multi-Agent Systems: Bridging the Gap Between AI Agent Governance and Robot Ethics

2026-04-17 · Mehmet Haklidir arxiv

Robotic systems are moving from isolated platforms to interconnected multi-agent ecosystems that operate in human environments. This shift raises a governance problem that existing frameworks do not address: how does con…

The BigCode Project Governance Card

2023-12-06 · BigCode collaboration, Sean Hughes, Harm de Vries, Jennifer Robinson 외

This document serves as an overview of the different mechanisms and areas of governance in the BigCode project. It aims to support transparency by providing relevant information about choices that were made during the pr…

Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Residential Load Scheduling under Data Governance

2021-10-06 · Zhaoming Qin, Nanqing Dong, Di Liu, Zhefan Wang 외

As a data-driven approach, multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has made remarkable advances in solving cooperative residential load scheduling problems. However, centralized training, the most common paradigm for M…

Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningPrivacy PreservingReinforcement Learning (RL)Scheduling

MARLA: A Conceptual Scaffold for Regulatory Learning under the EU AI Act

2026-09-04 · Alessio Buscemi, Tom Deckenbrunnen, Imane Hmiddou, Marco Billi 외 arxiv

The EU AI Act positions regulation as part of the infrastructure for safe, trustworthy and market-ready innovation. Realising this ambition requires regulatory learning: the evidence generated during implementation must …