paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Calibrated Credit Intelligence: Shift-Robust and Fair Risk Scoring with Bayesian Uncertainty and Gradient Boosting

2026-03-06 · Srikumar Nayak arxiv

Credit risk scoring must support high-stakes lending decisions where data distributions change over time, probability estimates must be reliable, and group-level fairness is required. While modern machine learning models improve default prediction accuracy, they often produce poorly calibrated scores under distribution shift and may create unfair outcomes when trained without explicit constraints. This paper proposes Calibrated Credit Intelligence (CCI), a deployment-oriented framework that combines (i) a Bayesian neural risk scorer to capture epistemic uncertainty and reduce overconfident errors, (ii) a fairnessconstrained gradient boosting model to control group disparities while preserving strong tabular performance, and (iii) a shiftaware fusion strategy followed by post-hoc probability calibration to stabilize decision thresholds in later time periods. We evaluate CCI on the Home Credit Credit Risk Model Stability benchmark using a time-consistent split to reflect real-world drift. Compared with strong baselines (LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, TabNet, and a standalone Bayesian neural model), CCI achieves the best overall trade-off between discrimination, calibration, stability, and fairness. In particular, CCI reaches an AUC-ROC of 0.912 and an AUC-PR of 0.438, improves operational performance with Recall@1%FPR = 0.509, and reduces calibration error (Brier score 0.087, ECE 0.015). Under temporal shift, CCI shows a smaller AUC-PR drop from early to late periods (0.017), and it lowers group disparities (demographic parity gap 0.046, equal opportunity gap 0.037) compared to unconstrained boosting. These results indicate that CCI produces risk scores that are accurate, reliable, and more equitable under realistic deployment conditions.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.06733

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Solutions to the Problems of Algorithmic Discrimination

2019-11-08 · Nicholas Schmidt, Bryce Stephens

There is substantial evidence that Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms can generate bias against minorities, women, and other protected classes. Federal and state laws have been enacted to p…

Fairness

A Possibility in Algorithmic Fairness: Can Calibration and Equal Error Rates Be Reconciled?

2020-02-18 · Claire Lazar Reich, Suhas Vijaykumar

Decision makers increasingly rely on algorithmic risk scores to determine access to binary treatments including bail, loans, and medical interventions. In these settings, we reconcile two fairness criteria that were prev…

Fairness

Balancing Profit and Fairness in Risk-Based Pricing Markets

2025-05-30 · Jesse Thibodeau, Hadi Nekoei, Afaf Taïk, Janarthanan Rajendran 외

Dynamic, risk-based pricing can systematically exclude vulnerable consumer groups from essential resources such as health insurance and consumer credit. We show that a regulator can realign private incentives with social…

FairnessReinforcement Learning (RL)

Fairness Assessment for Artificial Intelligence in Financial Industry

2019-12-16 · Yukun Zhang, Longsheng Zhou

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is an important driving force for the development and transformation of the financial industry. However, with the fast-evolving AI technology and application, unintentional bias, insufficient…

Fairness

Structural Gender Bias in Credit Scoring: Proxy Leakage

2026-01-26 · Navya SD, Sreekanth D, SS Uma Sankari arxiv

As financial institutions increasingly adopt machine learning for credit risk assessment, the persistence of algorithmic bias remains a critical barrier to equitable financial inclusion. This study provides a comprehensi…