paper-with-me

Papers

Calibrating LLM Judges: Linear Probes for Fast and Reliable Uncertainty Estimation

2025-12-23 · Bhaktipriya Radharapu, Eshika Saxena, Kenneth Li, Chenxi Whitehouse, Adina Williams, Nicola Cancedda arxiv

As LLM-based judges become integral to industry applications, obtaining well-calibrated uncertainty estimates efficiently has become critical for production deployment. However, existing techniques, such as verbalized confidence and multi-generation methods, are often either poorly calibrated or computationally expensive. We introduce linear probes trained with a Brier score-based loss to provide calibrated uncertainty estimates from reasoning judges' hidden states, requiring no additional model training. We evaluate our approach on both objective tasks (reasoning, mathematics, factuality, coding) and subjective human preference judgments. Our results demonstrate that probes achieve superior calibration compared to existing methods with $\approx10$x computational savings, generalize robustly to unseen evaluation domains, and deliver higher accuracy on high-confidence predictions. However, probes produce conservative estimates that underperform on easier datasets but may benefit safety-critical deployments prioritizing low false-positive rates. Overall, our work demonstrates that interpretability-based uncertainty estimation provides a practical and scalable plug-and-play solution for LLM judges in production.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2512.22245

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Logarithmic Scores, Power-Law Discoveries: Disentangling Measurement from Coverage in Agent-Based Evaluation

2026-04-01 · HyunJoon Jung, William Na arxiv

LLM-based agent judges are an emerging approach to evaluating conversational AI, yet a fundamental uncertainty remains: can we trust their assessments, and if so, how many are needed? Through 960 sessions with two model …

Does the Judge Prefer English? Evaluating Language-Switching Invariance in LLM-as-a-Judge

2026-06-12 · Shaojie Yin arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) are now widely used as automatic judges for open-ended instruction-following evaluation. This practice is convenient, scalable, and often more semantically aware than reference-based metrics,…

Reference-Free Rating of LLM Responses via Latent Information

2025-09-29 · Leander Girrbach, Chi-Ping Su, Tankred Saanum, Richard Socher 외 arxiv

How reliable are single-response LLM-as-a-judge ratings without references, and can we obtain fine-grained, deterministic scores in this setting? We study the common practice of asking a judge model to assign Likert-scal…

Improving Preference Extraction In LLMs By Identifying Latent Knowledge Through Classifying Probes

2025-03-22 · Sharan Maiya, Yinhong Liu, Ramit Debnath, Anna Korhonen

Large Language Models (LLMs) are often used as automated judges to evaluate text, but their effectiveness can be hindered by various unintentional biases. We propose using linear classifying probes, trained by leveraging…

Common Sense Reasoning

Judging with Confidence: Calibrating Autoraters to Preference Distributions

2025-09-30 · Zhuohang Li, Xiaowei Li, Chengyu Huang, Guowang Li 외 arxiv

The alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human values increasingly relies on using other LLMs as automated judges, or ``autoraters''. However, their reliability is limited by a foundational issue: they are trai…

Reinforcement Learning