paper-with-me

Papers

Can Large Reasoning Models do Analogical Reasoning under Perceptual Uncertainty?

2025-03-14 · Giacomo Camposampiero, Michael Hersche, Roger Wattenhofer, Abu Sebastian, Abbas Rahimi

This work presents a first evaluation of two state-of-the-art Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), OpenAI's o3-mini and DeepSeek R1, on analogical reasoning, focusing on well-established nonverbal human IQ tests based on Raven's progressive matrices. We benchmark with the I-RAVEN dataset and its more difficult extension, I-RAVEN-X, which tests the ability to generalize to longer reasoning rules and ranges of the attribute values. To assess the influence of visual uncertainties on these nonverbal analogical reasoning tests, we extend the I-RAVEN-X dataset, which otherwise assumes an oracle perception. We adopt a two-fold strategy to simulate this imperfect visual perception: 1) we introduce confounding attributes which, being sampled at random, do not contribute to the prediction of the correct answer of the puzzles and 2) smoothen the distributions of the input attributes' values. We observe a sharp decline in OpenAI's o3-mini task accuracy, dropping from 86.6% on the original I-RAVEN to just 17.0% -- approaching random chance -- on the more challenging I-RAVEN-X, which increases input length and range and emulates perceptual uncertainty. This drop occurred despite spending 3.4x more reasoning tokens. A similar trend is also observed for DeepSeek R1: from 80.6% to 23.2%. On the other hand, a neuro-symbolic probabilistic abductive model, ARLC, that achieves state-of-the-art performances on I-RAVEN, can robustly reason under all these out-of-distribution tests, maintaining strong accuracy with only a modest reduction from 98.6% to 88.0%. Our code is available at https://github.com/IBM/raven-large-language-models.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2503.11207

Code (1)

ibm/raven-large-language-models 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

Attribute

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

ADOPT Please enter a description about the method here

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

I-RAVEN-X: Benchmarking Generalization and Robustness of Analogical and Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language and Reasoning Models

2025-10-20 · Giacomo Camposampiero, Michael Hersche, Roger Wattenhofer, Abu Sebastian 외 arxiv

We introduce I-RAVEN-X, a symbolic benchmark designed to evaluate generalization and robustness in analogical and mathematical reasoning for Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). I-RAVEN-X exten…

Mathematical Reasoning

In-Context Analogical Reasoning with Pre-Trained Language Models

2023-05-28 · Xiaoyang Hu, Shane Storks, Richard L. Lewis, Joyce Chai

Analogical reasoning is a fundamental capacity of human cognition that allows us to reason abstractly about novel situations by relating them to past experiences. While it is thought to be essential for robust reasoning …

In-Context LearningRelational Reasoning

Feature Resemblance: Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Analogical Reasoning in Transformers

2026-03-05 · Ruichen Xu, Wenjing Yan, Ying-Jun Angela Zhang arxiv

Understanding reasoning in large language models is complicated by evaluations that conflate multiple reasoning types. We isolate analogical reasoning, where a model transfers an attribute between entities that share kno…

Can Multimodal Large Language Model Think Analogically?

2024-11-02 · Diandian Guo, Cong Cao, Fangfang Yuan, Dakui Wang 외

Analogical reasoning, particularly in multimodal contexts, is the foundation of human perception and creativity. Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) has recently sparked considerable discussion due to its emergent cap…

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language Modelmodel+1

Emergent Analogical Reasoning in Transformers

2026-02-02 · Gouki Minegishi, Jingyuan Feng, Hiroki Furuta, Takeshi Kojima 외 arxiv

Analogy is a central faculty of human intelligence, enabling abstract patterns discovered in one domain to be applied to another. Despite its central role in cognition, the mechanisms by which Transformers acquire and im…