Can summarization approximate simplification? A gold standard comparison
This study explores the overlap between text summarization and simplification outputs. While summarization evaluation methods are streamlined, simplification lacks cohesion, prompting the question: how closely can abstractive summarization resemble gold-standard simplification? We address this by applying two BART-based BRIO summarization methods to the Newsela corpus, comparing outputs with manually annotated simplifications and achieving a top ROUGE-L score of 0.654. This provides insight into where summarization and simplification outputs converge and differ.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Abstractive Text SummarizationText SummarizationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
SASS: Data and Methods for Subject Aware Sentence Simplification
Sentence simplification tends to focus on the generic simplification of sentences by making them more readable and easier to understand. This paper provides a dataset aimed at training models that perform subject aware s…
Abstractive Text SummarizationData AugmentationSentenceAugAbEx: Bridging Abstractive and Extractive Legal Summarization
Automatic summarization of legal judgments liberates law professionals from heavy cognitive burden due to the complexity of the language, context-sensitive legal jargon, and the length of the document. Caveats of abstrac…
Easy-read Documents as a Gold Standard for Evaluation of Text Simplification Output
Estimating Summary Quality with Pairwise Preferences
Automatic evaluation systems in the field of automatic summarization have been relying on the availability of gold standard summaries for over ten years. Gold standard summaries are expensive to obtain and often require …
Text SummarizationInvestigating Text Simplification Evaluation
Modern text simplification (TS) heavily relies on the availability of gold standard data to build machine learning models. However, existing studies show that parallel TS corpora contain inaccurate simplifications and in…
Text Simplification