paper-with-me

Papers

Chain-of-Thought as a Lens: Evaluating Structured Reasoning Alignment between Human Preferences and Large Language Models

2025-11-09 · Boxuan Wang, Zhuoyun Li, Xinmiao Huang, Xiaowei Huang, Yi Dong arxiv

This paper primarily demonstrates a method to quantitatively assess the alignment between multi-step, structured reasoning in large language models and human preferences. We introduce the Alignment Score, a semantic-level metric that compares a model-produced chain of thought traces with a human-preferred reference by constructing semantic-entropy-based matrices over intermediate steps and measuring their divergence. Our analysis shows that Alignment Score tracks task accuracy across models and hop depths, and peaks at 2-hop reasoning. Empirical results further indicate that misalignment at greater reasoning depths is driven mainly by alignment errors such as thematic shift and redundant reasoning. Viewing chain sampling as drawing from a distribution over reasoning paths, we empirically demonstrate a strong and consistent correlation between Alignment Score and accuracy, readability, and coherence, supporting its use as a diagnostic signal. The code is available.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2511.06168

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens

2025-08-02 · Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Pingchuan Ma, Dawei Li 외 arxiv

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to be effective in eliciting structured reasoning (i.e., CoT reasoning) from large language models (LLMs). Regardless of its popularity, recent studies expose its failures …

ReasoningLens: Hierarchical Visualization and Diagnostic Auditing for Large Reasoning Models

2026-06-22 · Jun Zhang, Jiasheng Zheng, Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu 외 arxiv

The emergence of Large Reasoning Models has introduced exceptionally long Chain-of-Thought traces, creating a transparency burden where critical logic is often buried under massive procedural text. To address this, we pr…

Evaluating Prompting Strategies for Chart Question Answering with Large Language Models

2026-03-03 · Ruthuparna Naikar, Ying Zhu arxiv

Prompting strategies affect LLM reasoning performance, but their role in chart-based QA remains underexplored. We present a systematic evaluation of four widely used prompting paradigms (Zero-Shot, Few-Shot, Zero-Shot Ch…

Chart Question Answering

StyleBench: Evaluating thinking styles in Large Language Models

2025-09-25 · Junyu Guo, Shangding Gu, Ming Jin, Costas Spanos 외 arxiv

Structured reasoning can improve the inference performance of large language models (LLMs), but it also introduces computational cost and control constraints. When additional reasoning structure helps, and when it instea…

Let's Think Frame by Frame with VIP: A Video Infilling and Prediction Dataset for Evaluating Video Chain-of-Thought

2023-05-23 · Vaishnavi Himakunthala, Andy Ouyang, Daniel Rose, Ryan He 외

Despite exciting recent results showing vision-language systems' capacity to reason about images using natural language, their capacity for video reasoning remains under-explored. We motivate framing video reasoning as t…

DescriptiveVideo Prediction