ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing to Improve Health Literacy and Communication in Pediatric Populations and Beyond
Purpose: Enhanced health literacy has been linked to better health outcomes; however, few interventions have been studied. We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can serve as a medium to improve health literacy in children and other populations. Methods: We ran 288 conditions using 26 different prompts through ChatGPT-3.5, Microsoft Bing, and Google Bard. Given constraints imposed by rate limits, we tested a subset of 150 conditions through ChatGPT-4. The primary outcome measurements were the reading grade level (RGL) and word counts of output. Results: Across all models, output for basic prompts such as "Explain" and "What is (are)" were at, or exceeded, a 10th-grade RGL. When prompts were specified to explain conditions from the 1st to 12th RGL, we found that LLMs had varying abilities to tailor responses based on RGL. ChatGPT-3.5 provided responses that ranged from the 7th-grade to college freshmen RGL while ChatGPT-4 outputted responses from the 6th-grade to the college-senior RGL. Microsoft Bing provided responses from the 9th to 11th RGL while Google Bard provided responses from the 7th to 10th RGL. Discussion: ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 did better in achieving lower-grade level outputs. Meanwhile Bard and Bing tended to consistently produce an RGL that is at the high school level regardless of prompt. Additionally, Bard's hesitancy in providing certain outputs indicates a cautious approach towards health information. LLMs demonstrate promise in enhancing health communication, but future research should verify the accuracy and effectiveness of such tools in this context. Implications: LLMs face challenges in crafting outputs below a sixth-grade reading level. However, their capability to modify outputs above this threshold provides a potential mechanism to improve health literacy and communication in a pediatric population and beyond.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Performance Comparison of Large Language Models on VNHSGE English Dataset: OpenAI ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing Chat, and Google Bard
This paper presents a performance comparison of three large language models (LLMs), namely OpenAI ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing Chat (BingChat), and Google Bard, on the VNHSGE English dataset. The performance of BingChat, Bard…
Question AnsweringNews Verifiers Showdown: A Comparative Performance Evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, Bing AI, and Bard in News Fact-Checking
This study aimed to evaluate the proficiency of prominent Large Language Models (LLMs), namely OpenAI's ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0, Google's Bard(LaMDA), and Microsoft's Bing AI in discerning the truthfulness of news items usin…
Fact CheckingQuantifying Similarity: Text-Mining Approaches to Evaluate ChatGPT and Google Bard Content in Relation to BioMedical Literature
Background: The emergence of generative AI tools, empowered by Large Language Models (LLMs), has shown powerful capabilities in generating content. To date, the assessment of the usefulness of such content, generated by …
Prompt EngineeringCan ChatGPT and Bard Generate Aligned Assessment Items? A Reliability Analysis against Human Performance
ChatGPT and Bard are AI chatbots based on Large Language Models (LLM) that are slated to promise different applications in diverse areas. In education, these AI technologies have been tested for applications in assessmen…
Automated Essay ScoringGenerative AI Assistants in Software Development Education: A vision for integrating Generative AI into educational practice, not instinctively defending against it
The software development industry is amid another disruptive paradigm change - adopting the use of generative AI (GAI) assistants for programming. Whilst AI is already used in various areas of software engineering, GAI t…