Citation Grounding: Detecting and Reducing LLM Citation Hallucinations via Legal Citation Graphs
Large language models systematically hallucinate legal citations -- fabricating statute references, citing repealed provisions, and confusing jurisdictions -- yet no automated method exists to measure or reduce this behavior at scale. We propose citation grounding (CG), a metric that verifies LLM-generated legal citations against a ground-truth citation graph extracted from 100.8 million Ukrainian court decisions (502 million edges, 21,736 unique statute nodes). CG decomposes into three components -- citation precision (does the cited provision exist?), citation relevance (is it contextually appropriate?), and citation temporality (was it valid at the relevant date?) -- enabling differential diagnosis of hallucination types. Empirical evaluation on 100 Ukrainian legal queries across five systems -- four commercial LLMs via AWS Bedrock (Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Pixtral Large, Amazon Nova Pro/Lite) and one RAG-augmented production system -- reveals CG ranging from 0.791 to 0.873, with 13-21% of citations hallucinated. To reduce hallucinations without human annotation, we introduce Citation Grounding DPO (CG-DPO): a method that constructs preference pairs algorithmically by corrupting verified citations from real court decisions via four targeted strategies. On a dataset of 2,244 court decisions, a Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct model fine-tuned with LoRA achieves 98.5% mean validation accuracy in distinguishing correct from corrupted citations (rewards margin +14.9, std < 0.3 pp across 3 seeds). The citation graph, evaluation framework, and CG-DPO dataset are released as open resources.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Learning Fine-Grained Grounded Citations for Attributed Large Language Models
Despite the impressive performance on information-seeking tasks, large language models (LLMs) still struggle with hallucinations. Attributed LLMs, which augment generated text with in-line citations, have shown potential…
In-Context LearningCaVe-VLM-CoT: An Interpretable Vision-Language Model Framework
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remain prone to hallucinations, producing fluent but visually unfaithful outputs. Existing chain-of-thought and retrieval-augmented methods only partially address this, as they neither enfor…
Who Checks the Citations? Benchmarking Legal Hallucination Detection
Attorneys, judges, and pro se filers increasingly use AI to draft legal documents, yet these tools frequently fabricate citations. Despite predictions that newer models would hallucinate less or that court sanctions woul…
Towards Fine-Grained Citation Evaluation in Generated Text: A Comparative Analysis of Faithfulness Metrics
Large language models (LLMs) often produce unsupported or unverifiable content, known as "hallucinations." To mitigate this, retrieval-augmented LLMs incorporate citations, grounding the content in verifiable sources. De…
Binary ClassificationRetrievalConcise and Sufficient Sub-Sentence Citations for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
In retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) question answering systems, generating citations for large language model (LLM) outputs enhances verifiability and helps users identify potential hallucinations. However, we observ…
Question Answering