Claim Extraction in Biomedical Publications using Deep Discourse Model and Transfer Learning
Claims are a fundamental unit of scientific discourse. The exponential growth in the number of scientific publications makes automatic claim extraction an important problem for researchers who are overwhelmed by this information overload. Such an automated claim extraction system is useful for both manual and programmatic exploration of scientific knowledge. In this paper, we introduce a new dataset of 1,500 scientific abstracts from the biomedical domain with expert annotations for each sentence indicating whether the sentence presents a scientific claim. We introduce a new model for claim extraction and compare it to several baseline models including rule-based and deep learning techniques. Moreover, we show that using a transfer learning approach with a fine-tuning step allows us to improve performance from a large discourse-annotated dataset. Our final model increases F1-score by over 14 percent points compared to a baseline model without transfer learning. We release a publicly accessible tool for discourse and claims prediction along with an annotation tool. We discuss further applications beyond biomedical literature.
Code (2)
Tasks
SentenceTransfer LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Scientific Discourse Tagging for Evidence Extraction
Evidence plays a crucial role in any biomedical research narrative, providing justification for some claims and refutation for others. We seek to build models of scientific argument using information extraction methods f…
ArticlesRepresentation LearningGeneralized knowledge-enhanced framework for biomedical entity and relation extraction
In recent years, there has been an increasing number of frameworks developed for biomedical entity and relation extraction. This research effort aims to address the accelerating growth in biomedical publications and the …
RelationRelation ExtractionGrounding Fallacies Misrepresenting Scientific Publications in Evidence
Health-related misinformation claims often falsely cite a credible biomedical publication as evidence, which superficially appears to support the false claim. The publication does not really support the claim, but a read…
Fact CheckingLogical FallaciesMisinformationPassage Retrieval+1Use of Claim Graphing and Argumentation Schemes in Biomedical Literature: A Manual Approach to Analysis
Argumentation in an experimental life science paper consists of a main claim being supported with reasoned argumentative steps based on the data garnered from the experiments that were carried out. In this paper we repor…
Articles