Clarify or Answer: Reinforcement Learning for Agentic VQA with Context Under-specification
Real-world visual question answering (VQA) is often context-dependent: an image-question pair may be under-specified, such that the correct answer depends on external information that is not observable in the image. In such cases, directly answering can lead to confident but incorrect predictions. We propose CoA(Clarify-or-Answer), an ask-or-answer agent that separately models the decision to ask or answer, and what to ask if needed. CoA first determines whether clarification is necessary; if so, it asks a single focused question and then incorporates the response to produce the final answer. We introduce CONTEXTCLARIFY with a set of ambiguous VQA questions and the contrast set that is non-ambiguous. We further introduce GRPO-CR (Clarification Reasoning), a reinforcement learning approach that optimizes clarification question generation with multiple reward signals encouraging well-formed, focused, non-trivial questions that resolve ambiguity. Across three VLLMs and three datasets, CoA achieves consistent improvements at both the module and system levels, improving end-to-end VQA accuracy by an average of +15.3 points (83%) over prompting-based baselines
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Visual Question AnsweringReinforcement LearningQuestion GenerationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
ClarifyMT-Bench: Benchmarking and Improving Multi-Turn Clarification for Conversational Large Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as conversational assistants in open-domain, multi-turn settings, where users often provide incomplete or ambiguous information. However, existing LLM-focused clarif…
Do We Still Need GraphRAG? Benchmarking RAG and GraphRAG for Agentic Search Systems
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and its graph-based extensions (GraphRAG) are effective paradigms for improving large language model (LLM) reasoning by grounding generation in external knowledge. However, most exist…
Question AnsweringKnowing but Not Showing: LLMs Recognize Ambiguity but Rarely Ask Clarifying Questions
User queries are often underspecified and may admit multiple valid interpretations. Rather than silently making assumptions about the user's intent, a helpful assistant should surface such ambiguity by asking a clarifyin…
Question AnsweringControlling the Risk of Conversational Search via Reinforcement Learning
Users often formulate their search queries with immature language without well-developed keywords and complete structures. Such queries fail to express their true information needs and raise ambiguity as fragmental langu…
Conversational Searchreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)+1Learning to Clarify by Reinforcement Learning Through Reward-Weighted Fine-Tuning
Question answering (QA) agents automatically answer questions posed in natural language. In this work, we learn to ask clarifying questions in QA agents. The key idea in our method is to simulate conversations that conta…
Offline RLQuestion AnsweringReinforcement Learning (RL)