paper-with-me

Papers

Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMs

2023-11-16 · Michael J. Q. Zhang, Eunsol Choi

Resolving ambiguities through interaction is a hallmark of natural language, and modeling this behavior is a core challenge in crafting AI assistants. In this work, we study such behavior in LMs by proposing a task-agnostic framework for resolving ambiguity by asking users clarifying questions. Our framework breaks down this objective into three subtasks: (1) determining when clarification is needed, (2) determining what clarifying question to ask, and (3) responding accurately with the new information gathered through clarification. We evaluate systems across three NLP applications: question answering, machine translation and natural language inference. For the first subtask, we present a novel uncertainty estimation approach, intent-sim, that determines the utility of querying for clarification by estimating the entropy over user intents. Our method consistently outperforms existing uncertainty estimation approaches at identifying predictions that will benefit from clarification. When only allowed to ask for clarification on 10% of examples, our system is able to double the performance gains over randomly selecting examples to clarify. Furthermore, we find that intent-sim is robust, demonstrating improvements across a wide range of NLP tasks and LMs. Together, our work lays foundation for studying clarifying interactions with LMs.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2311.09469

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Machine TranslationNatural Language InferenceQuestion Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Deciding Whether to Ask Clarifying Questions in Large-Scale Spoken Language Understanding

2021-09-25 · Joo-Kyung Kim, Guoyin Wang, Sungjin Lee, Young-Bum Kim

A large-scale conversational agent can suffer from understanding user utterances with various ambiguities such as ASR ambiguity, intent ambiguity, and hypothesis ambiguity. When ambiguities are detected, the agent should…

Spoken Language Understanding

Ask-to-Clarify: Resolving Instruction Ambiguity through Multi-turn Dialogue

2025-09-18 · Xingyao Lin, Xinghao Zhu, Tianyi Lu, Guojin Zhong 외 arxiv

Embodied agents are intelligent systems designed to perceive, reason, and act within the physical world. While the robotics community has long strived to build such versatile agents, a fundamental limitation persists: mo…

In Search of Ambiguity: A Three-Stage Workflow Design to Clarify Annotation Guidelines for Crowd Workers

2021-12-04 · Vivek Krishna Pradhan, Mike Schaekermann, Matthew Lease

We propose a novel three-stage FIND-RESOLVE-LABEL workflow for crowdsourced annotation to reduce ambiguity in task instructions and thus improve annotation quality. Stage 1 (FIND) asks the crowd to find examples whose co…

TAG

ClarifyMT-Bench: Benchmarking and Improving Multi-Turn Clarification for Conversational Large Language Models

2025-12-24 · Sichun Luo, Yi Huang, Mukai Li, Shichang Meng 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as conversational assistants in open-domain, multi-turn settings, where users often provide incomplete or ambiguous information. However, existing LLM-focused clarif…

Knowing but Not Showing: LLMs Recognize Ambiguity but Rarely Ask Clarifying Questions

2026-05-24 · Jinyan Su, Claire Cardie arxiv

User queries are often underspecified and may admit multiple valid interpretations. Rather than silently making assumptions about the user's intent, a helpful assistant should surface such ambiguity by asking a clarifyin…

Question Answering