ClueAegis: Heuristic-to-Reasoning Cognitive-skill Learning for Unified Evidence-based Synthetic Image Detection
The rapid advancement of generative models has made synthetic images increasingly realistic, challenging reliable detection. Existing methods are often limited to end-to-end classification or monolithic reasoning, and thus fail to model structured forensic reasoning and heterogeneous visual evidence. We revisit synthetic image detection from a cognitive perspective and propose a \textit{Heuristic-to-Reasoning} cognitive skill learning framework for evidence-based forensic analysis. Given an input image, our framework first extracts heuristic perceptual clues, selects the optimal forensic skill, and then performs skill-conditioned reasoning for evidence extraction and decision making. To support this paradigm, we introduce \textbf{ClueAegis-Bench}, which decomposes synthetic image detection into explicitly annotated forensic cognitive skills for structured evaluation beyond binary classification. Based on this benchmark, we propose \textbf{ClueAegis} (\underline{C}ognitive-skill \underline{L}earning for \underline{U}nified \underline{E}vidence-based Synthetic Image Detection), a two-stage agentic framework that conducts heuristic skill selection followed by evidence-guided reasoning through skill-conditioned toolchains. This design reformulates synthetic image detection as a configurable multi-skill reasoning process that bridges perception, skill selection, and forensic reasoning. Extensive experiments show that ClueAegis achieves state-of-the-art performance while improving cross-domain generalization and robustness. It also provides transparent reasoning trajectories and structured forensic evidence, offering a more explainable alternative to conventional end-to-end detectors.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Domain GeneralizationBinary ClassificationDecision MakingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Disentangling Reasoning Capabilities from Language Models with Compositional Reasoning Transformers
This paper presents ReasonFormer, a unified reasoning framework for mirroring the modular and compositional reasoning process of humans in complex decision-making. Inspired by dual-process theory in cognitive science, th…
Decision MakingTwo Experts Are All You Need for Steering Thinking: Reinforcing Cognitive Effort in MoE Reasoning Models Without Additional Training
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures within Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved impressive reasoning capabilities by selectively activating experts to facilitate structured cognitive processes. Despite notable …
AllDomain GeneralizationInstruction FollowingMixture-of-ExpertsKnow When to Trust the Skill: Delayed Appraisal and Epistemic Vigilance for Single-Agent LLMs
As large language models (LLMs) transition into autonomous agents integrated with extensive tool ecosystems, traditional routing heuristics increasingly succumb to context pollution and "overthinking". We argue that the …
Modeling Human Behavior Part II -- Cognitive approaches and Uncertainty
As we discussed in Part I of this topic, there is a clear desire to model and comprehend human behavior. Given the popular presupposition of human reasoning as the standard for learning and decision-making, there have be…
Decision MakingAmanuensis: The Programmer's Apprentice
This document provides an overview of the material covered in a course taught at Stanford in the spring quarter of 2018. The course draws upon insight from cognitive and systems neuroscience to implement hybrid connectio…