paper-with-me

Papers

CodeARC: Benchmarking Reasoning Capabilities of LLM Agents for Inductive Program Synthesis

2025-03-29 · Anjiang Wei, Tarun Suresh, Jiannan Cao, Naveen Kannan, Yuheng Wu, Kai Yan, Thiago S. F. X. Teixeira, Ke Wang, Alex Aiken

Inductive program synthesis, or programming by example, requires synthesizing functions from input-output examples that generalize to unseen inputs. While large language model agents have shown promise in programming tasks guided by natural language, their ability to perform inductive program synthesis is underexplored. Existing evaluation protocols rely on static sets of examples and held-out tests, offering no feedback when synthesized functions are incorrect and failing to reflect real-world scenarios such as reverse engineering. We propose CodeARC, the Code Abstraction and Reasoning Challenge, a new evaluation framework where agents interact with a hidden target function by querying it with new inputs, synthesizing candidate functions, and iteratively refining their solutions using a differential testing oracle. This interactive setting encourages agents to perform function calls and self-correction based on feedback. We construct the first large-scale benchmark for general-purpose inductive program synthesis, featuring 1114 functions. Among 18 models evaluated, o3-mini performs best with a success rate of 52.7%, highlighting the difficulty of this task. Fine-tuning LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct on curated synthesis traces yields up to a 31% relative performance gain. CodeARC provides a more realistic and challenging testbed for evaluating LLM-based program synthesis and inductive reasoning.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2503.23145

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

BenchmarkingLarge Language ModelProgram Synthesis

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reasoning Abilities of LLMs

2024-07-31 · Kewei Cheng, Jingfeng Yang, Haoming Jiang, Zhengyang Wang 외

Reasoning encompasses two typical types: deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning. Despite extensive research into the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), most studies have failed to rigorously dif…

counterfactualCounterfactual Reasoning

Dynamic Benchmarking of Reasoning Capabilities in Code Large Language Models Under Data Contamination

2025-03-06 · Simin Chen, Pranav Pusarla, Baishakhi Ray

The rapid evolution of code largelanguage models underscores the need for effective and transparent benchmarking of their reasoning capabilities. However, the current benchmarking approach heavily depends on publicly ava…

Benchmarking

Scaling, Benchmarking, and Reasoning of Vision-Language Agents for Mobile GUI Navigation

2026-05-26 · Heng Qu, Yike Liu, Renren Jin, Wenzong Zhang 외 arxiv

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown rapid progress in mobile GUI navigation. This paper presents a systematic study of data scaling, benchmarking, and reasoning for VLM-based agents in this domain. To facilitate rig…

Reinforcement Learning

OdysseyArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models For Long-Horizon, Active and Inductive Interactions

2026-02-05 · Hang Yan, Fangzhi Xu, Qiushi Sun, Jinyang Wu 외 arxiv

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has catalyzed the development of autonomous agents capable of navigating complex environments. However, existing evaluations primarily adopt a deductive paradigm, whe…

Mars: Situated Inductive Reasoning in an Open-World Environment

2024-10-10 · Xiaojuan Tang, Jiaqi Li, Yitao Liang, Song-Chun Zhu 외

Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on massive corpora have shown remarkable success in knowledge-intensive tasks. Yet, most of them rely on pre-stored knowledge. Inducing new general knowledge from a specific environme…

Decision MakingGeneral Knowledge