Cognitive Alignment At No Cost: Inducing Human Attention Biases For Interpretable Vision Transformers
For state-of-the-art image understanding, Vision Transformers (ViTs) have become the standard architecture but their processing diverges substantially from human attentional characteristics. We investigate whether this cognitive gap can be shrunk by fine-tuning the self-attention weights of Google's ViT-B/16 on human saliency fixation maps. To isolate the effects of semantically relevant signals from generic human supervision, the tuned model is compared against a shuffled control. Fine-tuning significantly improved alignment across five saliency metrics and induced three hallmark human-like biases: tuning reversed the baseline's anti-human large-object bias toward small-objects, amplified the animacy preference and diminished extreme attention entropy. Bayesian parity analysis provides decisive to very-strong evidence that this cognitive alignment comes at no cost to the model's original classification performance on in- (ImageNet), corrupted (ImageNet-C) and out-of-distribution (ObjectNet) benchmarks. An equivalent procedure applied to a ResNet-50 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) instead degraded both alignment and accuracy, suggesting that the ViT's modular self-attention mechanism is uniquely suited for dissociating spatial priority from representational logic. These findings demonstrate that biologically grounded priors can be instilled as a free emergent property of human-aligned attention, to improve transformer interpretability.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Disrupting Cognitive Passivity: Rethinking AI-Assisted Data Literacy through Cognitive Alignment
AI chatbots are increasingly stepping into roles as collaborators or teachers in analyzing, visualizing, and reasoning through data and domain problem. Yet, AI's default assistant mode with its comprehensive and one-off …
Is General-Purpose AI Reasoning Sensitive to Data-Induced Cognitive Biases? Dynamic Benchmarking on Typical Software Engineering Dilemmas
Human cognitive biases in software engineering can lead to costly errors. While general-purpose AI (GPAI) systems may help mitigate these biases due to their non-human nature, their training on human-generated data raise…
Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Robotic Cognitive Alignment enabled by Non-Invasive Consumer Brain Computer Interfaces: A Proof of Concept Exploration
While non-verbal behaviors and expressive movements are essential for natural human-robot interaction, existing methods often overlook a crucial element: the human's internal cognitive state. Frequently, proactive multi-…
Effort as Ceiling, Not Dial: Reasoning Budget Does Not Modulate Cognitive Cost Alignment Between Humans and Large Reasoning Models
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) generate chain-of-thought traces whose length tracks human reaction times across cognitive tasks, but recent debate questions whether this alignment reflects genuine computational structure …
Hán Dān Xué Bù (Mimicry) or Qīng Chū Yú Lán (Mastery)? A Cognitive Perspective on Reasoning Distillation in Large Language Models
Recent Large Reasoning Models trained via reinforcement learning exhibit a "natural" alignment with human cognitive costs. However, we show that the prevailing paradigm of reasoning distillation -- training student model…
Reinforcement Learning