Collective Reasoning Among LLMs A Framework for Answer Validation Without Ground Truth
We present a collaborative framework where multiple large language models, namely GPT-4-0125-preview, Meta-LLaMA-3-70B-Instruct, Claude-3-Opus, and Gemini-1.5-Flash, work together to generate and respond to complex PhD-level probability questions in the absence of definitive ground truth. This study explores how inter-model consensus enhances response reliability and serves as a proxy for assessing the quality of generated questions. To quantify agreement and consistency, we employ statistical methods including chi-square tests, Fleiss' Kappa, and confidence interval analysis, measuring both response precision and question clarity. Our findings highlight that Claude and Gemini generate well-structured and less ambiguous questions, leading to higher inter-model agreement. This is reflected in their narrower confidence intervals and stronger alignment with answering models. Conversely, LLaMA demonstrates increased variability and lower reliability in question formulation, as indicated by broader confidence intervals and reduced consensus rates. These results suggest that multi-model collaboration not only enhances the reliability of responses but also provides a valuable framework for assessing and improving question quality in the absence of explicit ground truth. This research offers meaningful insights into optimizing AI-driven reasoning through collaborative large-language model interactions.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Large Language ModelMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Mulberry: Empowering MLLM with o1-like Reasoning and Reflection via Collective Monte Carlo Tree Search
In this work, we aim to develop an MLLM that understands and solves questions by learning to create each intermediate step of the reasoning involved till the final answer. To this end, we propose Collective Monte Carlo T…
Wisdom of the Crowd: Reinforcement Learning from Coevolutionary Collective Feedback
Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), but its reliance on expensive human-labeled data or complex reward models severely limits scalability. Wh…
Reinforcement LearningMathematical ReasoningFrom Chat Logs to Collective Insights: Aggregative Question Answering
Conversational agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are rapidly becoming integral to our daily interactions, generating unprecedented amounts of conversational data. Such datasets offer a powerful lens into soc…
ChatbotQuestion AnsweringProblem-Solving in Language Model Networks
To improve the reasoning and question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), several multi-agent approaches have been introduced. While these methods enhance performance, the application of collective in…
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingmodelQuestion AnsweringMulti-agent Undercover Gaming: Hallucination Removal via Counterfactual Test for Multimodal Reasoning
Hallucination continues to pose a major obstacle in the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Although the Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) paradigm offers a promising solution by promoting consensus among mult…
Multimodal Reasoning