Comment on arXiv:2511.21731v1: Identifying Quantum Structure in AI Language: Evidence for Evolutionary Convergence of Human and Artificial Cognition
This note is a friendly technical check of arXiv:2511.21731v1. I highlight a few places where the manuscript's interpretation of (i) the reported CHSH/Bell-type calculations and (ii) Bose--Einstein (BE) fits to rank-frequency data seems to go beyond what the stated procedures can firmly support. I also point out one internal inconsistency in the "energy-level spacing" analogy. The aim is constructive: to keep the interesting empirical observations, while making clear what they do (and do not) imply about quantum entanglement in the usual Hilbert-space sense, especially when "energy" is defined by rank.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
WithdrarXiv: A Large-Scale Dataset for Retraction Study
Retractions play a vital role in maintaining scientific integrity, yet systematic studies of retractions in computer science and other STEM fields remain scarce. We present WithdrarXiv, the first large-scale dataset of w…
Automated Theorem ProvingClaim VerificationComment on "Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?" [arXiv:1608.08225]
In a recent paper, "Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?", Lin and Tegmark claim to show that the mapping between deep belief networks and the variational renormalization group derived in [arXiv:1410.3831] is i…
Comment on "robustness and regularization of support vector machines" by H. Xu, et al., (Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 10, pp. 1485-1510, 2009, arXiv:0803.3490)
This paper comments on the published work dealing with robustness and regularization of support vector machines (Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 10, pp. 1485-1510, 2009) [arXiv:0803.3490] by H. Xu, etc. They p…
BIG-bench Machine LearningA comment on Guo et al. [arXiv:2206.11228]
In a recent article, Guo et al. [arXiv:2206.11228] report that adversarially trained neural representations in deep networks may already be as robust as corresponding primate IT neural representations. While we find the …
Reply to 'Comments on Graphon Signal Processing' [arXiv:2310.14683]
This technical note addresses an issue [arXiv:2310.14683] with the proof (but not the statement) of [arXiv:2003.05030, Proposition 4]. The statement of the proposition is correct, but the proof as written in [arXiv:2003.…
LEMMAvalid