paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Comment Ranking Diversification in Forum Discussions

2020-02-27 · Curtis G. Northcutt, Kimberly A. Leon, Naichun Chen

Viewing consumption of discussion forums with hundreds or more comments depends on ranking because most users only view top-ranked comments. When comments are ranked by an ordered score (e.g. number of replies or up-votes) without adjusting for semantic similarity of near-ranked comments, top-ranked comments are more likely to emphasize the majority opinion and incur redundancy. In this paper, we propose a top K comment diversification re-ranking model using Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) and evaluate its impact in three categories: (1) semantic diversity, (2) inclusion of the semantics of lower-ranked comments, and (3) redundancy, within the context of a HarvardX course discussion forum. We conducted a double-blind, small-scale evaluation experiment requiring subjects to select between the top 5 comments of a diversified ranking and a baseline ranking ordered by score. For three subjects, across 100 trials, subjects selected the diversified (75% score, 25% diversification) ranking as significantly (1) more diverse, (2) more inclusive, and (3) less redundant. Within each category, inter-rater reliability showed moderate consistency, with typical Cohen-Kappa scores near 0.2. Our findings suggest that our model improves (1) diversification, (2) inclusion, and (3) redundancy, among top K ranked comments in online discussion forums.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2002.12457

Code (1)

cgnorthcutt/forum-diversification 공식 구현 tf

Tasks

Re-RankingSemantic SimilaritySemantic Textual Similarity

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Talking to the crowd: What do people react to in online discussions?

2015-07-08 · EMNLP 2015 9 · Aaron Jaech, Victoria Zayats, Hao Fang, Mari Ostendorf 외

This paper addresses the question of how language use affects community reaction to comments in online discussion forums, and the relative importance of the message vs. the messenger. A new comment ranking task is propos…

The News Comment Gap and Algorithmic Agenda Setting in Online Forums

2024-08-13 · Flora Böwing, Patrick Gildersleve

The disparity between news stories valued by journalists and those preferred by readers, known as the "News Gap", is well-documented. However, the difference in expectations regarding news related user-generated content …

CommentWatcher: An Open Source Web-based platform for analyzing discussions on web forums

2015-04-28 · Marian-Andrei Rizoiu, Adrien Guille, Julien Velcin

We present CommentWatcher, an open source tool aimed at analyzing discussions on web forums. Constructed as a web platform, CommentWatcher features automatic mass fetching of user posts from forum on multiple sites, extr…

Diversity

A Dataset of Journalists' Interactions with Their Readership: When Should Article Authors Reply to Reader Comments?

2020-10-19 · Julian Risch, Ralf Krestel

The comment sections of online news platforms are an important space to indulge in political conversations and to discuss opinions. Although primarily meant as forums where readers discuss amongst each other, they can al…

Articles

Anger Breeds Controversy: Analyzing Controversy and Emotions on Reddit

2022-12-01 · Kai Chen, Zihao He, Rong-Ching Chang, Jonathan May 외

Emotions play an important role in interpersonal interactions and social conflict, yet their function in the development of controversy and disagreement in online conversations has not been explored. To address this gap,…