Compatibility of Fairness Metrics with EU Non-Discrimination Laws: Demographic Parity & Conditional Demographic Disparity
Empirical evidence suggests that algorithmic decisions driven by Machine Learning (ML) techniques threaten to discriminate against legally protected groups or create new sources of unfairness. This work supports the contextual approach to fairness in EU non-discrimination legal framework and aims at assessing up to what point we can assure legal fairness through fairness metrics and under fairness constraints. For that, we analyze the legal notion of non-discrimination and differential treatment with the fairness definition Demographic Parity (DP) through Conditional Demographic Disparity (CDD). We train and compare different classifiers with fairness constraints to assess whether it is possible to reduce bias in the prediction while enabling the contextual approach to judicial interpretation practiced under EU non-discrimination laws. Our experimental results on three scenarios show that the in-processing bias mitigation algorithm leads to different performances in each of them. Our experiments and analysis suggest that AI-assisted decision-making can be fair from a legal perspective depending on the case at hand and the legal justification. These preliminary results encourage future work which will involve further case studies, metrics, and fairness notions.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Decision MakingFairnessSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AI
This article identifies a critical incompatibility between European notions of discrimination and existing statistical measures of fairness. First, we review the evidential requirements to bring a claim under EU non-disc…
FairnessMetrics for Dataset Demographic Bias: A Case Study on Facial Expression Recognition
Demographic biases in source datasets have been shown as one of the causes of unfairness and discrimination in the predictions of Machine Learning models. One of the most prominent types of demographic bias are statistic…
Emotion RecognitionFacial Emotion RecognitionFacial Expression RecognitionFairnessSensitiveLoss: Improving Accuracy and Fairness of Face Representations with Discrimination-Aware Deep Learning
We propose a discrimination-aware learning method to improve both accuracy and fairness of biased face recognition algorithms. The most popular face recognition benchmarks assume a distribution of subjects without paying…
Face RecognitionFairnessTripletAddressing multiple metrics of group fairness in data-driven decision making
The Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning (FAT-ML) literature proposes a varied set of group fairness metrics to measure discrimination against socio-demographic groups that are characterized by …
BIG-bench Machine LearningDecision MakingFairnessBiased Heritage: How Datasets Shape Models in Facial Expression Recognition
In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised concerns about our ability to ensure their fairness, that is, how to avoid discrimination based on protected characteristics such …
Binary ClassificationFacial Expression RecognitionFacial Expression Recognition (FER)Fairness