paper-with-me

Papers

Compositional Online Learning for Semantic Data Processing Systems

2026-08-27 · Paweł Liskowski, Fuheng Zhao, Benjamin Han, Anupam Datta, Dimitris Tsirogiannis arxiv

An LLM call in a semantic data processing system is expensive enough to dominate query cost, yet slow enough to hide a CPU-side learner's update behind its round-trip. In production, LLM compute accounts for $80-90\%$ of query cost, and each call costs $10^5-10^7\times$ a relational predicate. The latency window inverts a design constraint of classical adaptive query processing, where online learners had to stay lightweight to avoid dominating the predicates they optimize. At LLM latency, per-call gradient steps and per-batch threshold solves fit inside the round-trip. We develop compositional online learning at the LLM call boundary: a framework for combining online-learning components in semantic data processing systems. Each component makes execution-time decisions and refines its learned artifacts online. The design space spans two axes, decision granularity and learner update cadence, and the components share a single learning pattern that hides each trainer step inside the next LLM round-trip. A production case study in Cortex AISQL composes three components: a memoization layer, an online per-call filter-ordering learner, and an online per-batch cascade-routing learner. A conditional cost decomposition assigns each learning component to a distinct factor of per-row LLM cost. Under independence, the two learning components compose multiplicatively to an $11.4\times$ upper bound on a representative conjunction-filter workload. Self-selection at the cascade boundary, sample-budget shrinkage, and selectivity-estimation drift reduce it to a realistic figure near $8\times$.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2608.27244

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Compositional generalization in a deep seq2seq model by separating syntax and semantics

2019-04-22 · Jake Russin, Jason Jo, Randall C. O'Reilly, Yoshua Bengio

Standard methods in deep learning for natural language processing fail to capture the compositional structure of human language that allows for systematic generalization outside of the training distribution. However, hum…

Deep LearningMachine TranslationSystematic GeneralizationTranslation

Compositional Generalization by Factorizing Alignment and Translation

2020-07-01 · ACL 2020 6 · Jacob Russin, Jason Jo, R O{'}Reilly, all 외

Standard methods in deep learning for natural language processing fail to capture the compositional structure of human language that allows for systematic generalization outside of the training distribution. However, hum…

Machine TranslationSystematic GeneralizationTranslation

A Multivariate Model for Representing Semantic Non-compositionality

2019-08-15 · Meghdad Farahmand

Semantically non-compositional phrases constitute an intriguing research topic in Natural Language Processing. Semantic non-compositionality --the situation when the meaning of a phrase cannot be derived from the meaning…

model

Design considerations for a hierarchical semantic compositional framework for medical natural language understanding

2022-04-05 · Ricky K. Taira, Anders O. Garlid, William Speier

Medical natural language processing (NLP) systems are a key enabling technology for transforming Big Data from clinical report repositories to information used to support disease models and validate intervention methods.…

Natural Language UnderstandingSemantic CompositionSentence

Consciousness is entailed by compositional learning of new causal structures in deep predictive processing systems

2023-01-17 · V. A. Aksyuk

Machine learning algorithms have achieved superhuman performance in specific complex domains. However, learning online from few examples and compositional learning for efficient generalization across domains remain elusi…

Bayesian InferenceValue prediction