paper-with-me

Papers

Consistent Instance False Positive Improves Fairness in Face Recognition

2021-06-10 · CVPR 2021 1 · Xingkun Xu, Yuge Huang, Pengcheng Shen, Shaoxin Li, Jilin Li, Feiyue Huang, Yong Li, Zhen Cui

Demographic bias is a significant challenge in practical face recognition systems. Existing methods heavily rely on accurate demographic annotations. However, such annotations are usually unavailable in real scenarios. Moreover, these methods are typically designed for a specific demographic group and are not general enough. In this paper, we propose a false positive rate penalty loss, which mitigates face recognition bias by increasing the consistency of instance False Positive Rate (FPR). Specifically, we first define the instance FPR as the ratio between the number of the non-target similarities above a unified threshold and the total number of the non-target similarities. The unified threshold is estimated for a given total FPR. Then, an additional penalty term, which is in proportion to the ratio of instance FPR overall FPR, is introduced into the denominator of the softmax-based loss. The larger the instance FPR, the larger the penalty. By such unequal penalties, the instance FPRs are supposed to be consistent. Compared with the previous debiasing methods, our method requires no demographic annotations. Thus, it can mitigate the bias among demographic groups divided by various attributes, and these attributes are not needed to be previously predefined during training. Extensive experimental results on popular benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our method over state-of-the-art competitors. Code and trained models are available at https://github.com/Tencent/TFace.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2106.05519

Code (1)

Tencent/TFace 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

Face RecognitionFairness

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Fairness-aware Model-agnostic Positive and Unlabeled Learning

2022-06-19 · Ziwei Wu, Jingrui He

With the increasing application of machine learning in high-stake decision-making problems, potential algorithmic bias towards people from certain social groups poses negative impacts on individuals and our society at la…

Binary ClassificationDecision MakingFairnessMedical Diagnosis+1

OxonFair: A Flexible Toolkit for Algorithmic Fairness

2024-06-30 · Eoin Delaney, Zihao Fu, Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt 외

We present OxonFair, a new open source toolkit for enforcing fairness in binary classification. Compared to existing toolkits: (i) We support NLP and Computer Vision classification as well as standard tabular problems. (…

ArticlesBinary ClassificationFairness

Fairness in machine learning: against false positive rate equality as a measure of fairness

2020-07-06 · Robert Long

As machine learning informs increasingly consequential decisions, different metrics have been proposed for measuring algorithmic bias or unfairness. Two popular fairness measures are calibration and equality of false pos…

BIG-bench Machine LearningEthicsFairness

Machine Learning Fairness in Justice Systems: Base Rates, False Positives, and False Negatives

2020-08-05 · Jesse Russell

Machine learning best practice statements have proliferated, but there is a lack of consensus on what the standards should be. For fairness standards in particular, there is little guidance on how fairness might be achie…

BIG-bench Machine LearningFairness

Is calibration a fairness requirement? An argument from the point of view of moral philosophy and decision theory

2022-05-11 · Michele Loi, Christoph Heitz

In this paper, we provide a moral analysis of two criteria of statistical fairness debated in the machine learning literature: 1) calibration between groups and 2) equality of false positive and false negative rates betw…

FairnessPhilosophy