paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Content vs. Form: What Drives the Writing Score Gap Across Socioeconomic Backgrounds? A Generated Panel Approach

2026-01-06 · Nadav Kunievsky, Pedro Pertusi arxiv

Students from different socioeconomic backgrounds exhibit persistent gaps in test scores, gaps that can translate into unequal educational and labor-market outcomes later in life. In many assessments, performance reflects not only what students know, but also how effectively they can communicate that knowledge. This distinction is especially salient in writing assessments, where scores jointly reward the substance of students' ideas and the way those ideas are expressed. As a result, observed score gaps may conflate differences in underlying content with differences in expressive skill. A central question, therefore, is how much of the socioeconomic-status (SES) gap in scores is driven by differences in what students say versus how they say it. We study this question using a large corpus of persuasive essays written by U.S. middle- and high-school students. We introduce a new measurement strategy that separates content from style by leveraging large language models to generate multiple stylistic variants of each essay. These rewrites preserve the underlying arguments while systematically altering surface expression, creating a "generated panel" that introduces controlled within-essay variation in style. This approach allows us to decompose SES gaps in writing scores into contributions from content and style. We find an SES gap of 0.67 points on a 1-6 scale. Approximately 69% of the gap is attributable to differences in essay content quality, Style differences account for 26% of the gap, and differences in evaluation standards across SES groups account for the remaining 5%. These patterns seems stable across demographic subgroups and writing tasks. More broadly, our approach shows how large language models can be used to generate controlled variation in observational data, enabling researchers to isolate and quantify the contributions of otherwise entangled factors.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2601.03469

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Style, Content, and the Success of Ideas

2022-01-10 · Reihane Boghrati, Jonah Berger, Grant Packard

Why do some things succeed in the marketplace of ideas? While some argue that content drives success, others suggest that style, or the way ideas are presented, also plays an important role. To provide a stringent test o…

Articles

What do writing features tell us about AI papers?

2021-07-13 · Zining Zhu, Bai Li, Yang Xu, Frank Rudzicz

As the numbers of submissions to conferences grow quickly, the task of assessing the quality of academic papers automatically, convincingly, and with high accuracy attracts increasing attention. We argue that studying in…

Articles

Exploring AI-Generated Text in Student Writing: How Does AI Help?

2023-03-10 · David James Woo, Hengky Susanto, Chi Ho Yeung, Kai Guo 외

English as foreign language_EFL_students' use of text generated from artificial intelligence_AI_natural language generation_NLG_tools may improve their writing quality. However, it remains unclear to what extent AI-gener…

When LLM Essays Outscore Student Essays: What a Korean Writing Rubric Rewards and Where Readers Disagree

2026-01-06 · Shinwoo Park, Yo-Sub Han arxiv

LLMs now help students plan, draft, and revise essays. Educational assessment therefore faces a basic question: how should student and LLM writing be compared? Rubrics assign points to content, organization, and expressi…

"I Wrote, I Paused, I Rewrote" Teaching LLMs to Read Between the Lines of Student Writing

2025-06-09 · Samra Zafar, Shaheer Minhas, Syed Ali Hassan Zaidi, Arfa Naeem 외

Large language models(LLMs) like Gemini are becoming common tools for supporting student writing. But most of their feedback is based only on the final essay missing important context about how that text was written. In …