Contextual explanation rules for neural clinical classifiers
Several previous studies on explanation for recurrent neural networks focus on approaches that find the most important input segments for a network as its explanations. In that case, the manner in which these input segments combine with each other to form an explanatory pattern remains unknown. To overcome this, some previous work tries to find patterns (called rules) in the data that explain neural outputs. However, their explanations are often insensitive to model parameters, which limits the scalability of text explanations. To overcome these limitations, we propose a pipeline to explain RNNs by means of decision lists (also called rules) over skipgrams. For evaluation of explanations, we create a synthetic sepsis-identification dataset, as well as apply our technique on additional clinical and sentiment analysis datasets. We find that our technique persistently achieves high explanation fidelity and qualitatively interpretable rules.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Sentiment AnalysisSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Reproducibility Report: Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanation
The presented report evaluates Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanation paper within the scope of ML Reproducibility Challenge 2020. Our work focuses on both aspects constituting the paper: the m…
Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes
Medical experts may use Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems with greater trust if these are supported by contextual explanations that let the practitioner connect system inferences to their context of use. However, thei…
Question AnsweringContextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanation
Hate speech classifiers trained on imbalanced datasets struggle to determine if group identifiers like "gay" or "black" are used in offensive or prejudiced ways. Such biases manifest in false positives when these identif…
Abductive and Contrastive Explanations for Scoring Rules in Voting
We view voting rules as classifiers that assign a winner (a class) to a profile of voters' preferences (an instance). We propose to apply techniques from formal explainability, most notably abductive and contrastive expl…
Logi-PAR: Logic-Infused Patient Activity Recognition via Differentiable Rule
Patient Activity Recognition (PAR) in clinical settings uses activity data to improve safety and quality of care. Although significant progress has been made, current models mainly identify which activity is occurring. T…
Activity Recognition