Contradiction Detection for Rumorous Claims
The utilization of social media material in journalistic workflows is increasing, demanding automated methods for the identification of mis- and disinformation. Since textual contradiction across social media posts can be a signal of rumorousness, we seek to model how claims in Twitter posts are being textually contradicted. We identify two different contexts in which contradiction emerges: its broader form can be observed across independently posted tweets and its more specific form in threaded conversations. We define how the two scenarios differ in terms of central elements of argumentation: claims and conversation structure. We design and evaluate models for the two scenarios uniformly as 3-way Recognizing Textual Entailment tasks in order to represent claims and conversation structure implicitly in a generic inference model, while previous studies used explicit or no representation of these properties. To address noisy text, our classifiers use simple similarity features derived from the string and part-of-speech level. Corpus statistics reveal distribution differences for these features in contradictory as opposed to non-contradictory tweet relations, and the classifiers yield state of the art performance.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Natural Language InferenceSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
WikiContradiction: Detecting Self-Contradiction Articles on Wikipedia
While Wikipedia has been utilized for fact-checking and claim verification to debunk misinformation and disinformation, it is essential to either improve article quality and rule out noisy articles. Self-contradiction is…
ArticlesClaim VerificationFact CheckingMisinformation+1Exploring Graph-aware Multi-View Fusion for Rumor Detection on Social Media
Automatic detecting rumors on social media has become a challenging task. Previous studies focus on learning indicative clues from conversation threads for identifying rumorous information. However, these methods only mo…
Representation LearningA Knowledge Enhanced Learning and Semantic Composition Model for Multi-Claim Fact Checking
To inhibit the spread of rumorous information and its severe consequences, traditional fact checking aims at retrieving relevant evidence to verify the veracity of a given claim. Fact checking methods typically use knowl…
Fact CheckingKnowledge GraphsSemantic CompositionExplanation-Bound Tool Execution for AI Agents: Server-Verified Action Claims Without Trusting Model Rationales
Tool-using agents expose structured calls but commonly attach free-form rationales. Such rationales are neither authorization nor reliable introspection. We present Explanation-Bound Tool Execution (EBTE), a claim-carryi…
Veracity Computing from Lexical Cues and Perceived Certainty Trends
We present a data-driven method for determining the veracity of a set of rumorous claims on social media data. Tweets from different sources pertaining to a rumor are processed on three levels: first, factuality values a…