paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Controlling Output Rankings in Generative Engines for LLM-based Search

2026-02-03 · Haibo Jin, Ruoxi Chen, Peiyan Zhang, Yifeng Luo, Huimin Zeng, Man Luo, Haohan Wang arxiv

The way customers search for and choose products is changing with the rise of large language models (LLMs). LLM-based search, or generative engines, provides direct product recommendations to users, rather than traditional online search results that require users to explore options themselves. However, these recommendations are strongly influenced by the initial retrieval order of LLMs, which disadvantages small businesses and independent creators by limiting their visibility. In this work, we propose CORE, an optimization method that \textbf{C}ontrols \textbf{O}utput \textbf{R}ankings in g\textbf{E}nerative Engines for LLM-based search. Since the LLM's interactions with the search engine are black-box, CORE targets the content returned by search engines as the primary means of influencing output rankings. Specifically, CORE optimizes retrieved content by appending strategically designed optimization content to steer the ranking of outputs. We introduce three types of optimization content: string-based, reasoning-based, and review-based, demonstrating their effectiveness in shaping output rankings. To evaluate CORE in realistic settings, we introduce ProductBench, a large-scale benchmark with 15 product categories and 200 products per category, where each product is associated with its top-10 recommendations collected from Amazon's search interface. Extensive experiments on four LLMs with search capabilities (GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5, Claude-4, and Grok-3) demonstrate that CORE achieves an average Promotion Success Rate of \textbf{91.4\% @Top-5}, \textbf{86.6\% @Top-3}, and \textbf{80.3\% @Top-1}, across 15 product categories, outperforming existing ranking manipulation methods while preserving the fluency of optimized content.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2602.03608

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Search Engines Post-ChatGPT: How Generative Artificial Intelligence Could Make Search Less Reliable

2024-02-18 · Shahan Ali Memon, Jevin D. West

In this commentary, we discuss the evolving nature of search engines, as they begin to generate, index, and distribute content created by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Our discussion highlights challenges i…

Stability and Multigroup Fairness in Ranking with Uncertain Predictions

2024-02-14 · Siddartha Devic, Aleksandra Korolova, David Kempe, Vatsal Sharan

Rankings are ubiquitous across many applications, from search engines to hiring committees. In practice, many rankings are derived from the output of predictors. However, when predictors trained for classification tasks …

Fairness

hyperFA*IR: A hypergeometric approach to fair rankings with finite candidate pool

2025-06-17 · Mauritz N. Cartier van Dissel, Samuel Martin-Gutierrez, Lisette Espín-Noboa, Ana María Jaramillo 외

Ranking algorithms play a pivotal role in decision-making processes across diverse domains, from search engines to job applications. When rankings directly impact individuals, ensuring fairness becomes essential, particu…

Fairness

Consensus measure of rankings

2017-04-27 · Zhiwei Lin, Yi Li, Xiaolian Guo

A ranking is an ordered sequence of items, in which an item with higher ranking score is more preferred than the items with lower ranking scores. In many information systems, rankings are widely used to represent the pre…

Assessing Viewpoint Diversity in Search Results Using Ranking Fairness Metrics

2020-10-27 · Tim Draws, Nava Tintarev, Ujwal Gadiraju, Alessandro Bozzon 외

The way pages are ranked in search results influences whether the users of search engines are exposed to more homogeneous, or rather to more diverse viewpoints. However, this viewpoint diversity is not trivial to assess.…

DiversityFairness