paper-with-me

Papers

CoTAL: Human-in-the-Loop Prompt Engineering, Chain-of-Thought Reasoning, and Active Learning for Generalizable Formative Assessment Scoring

2025-04-03 · Clayton Cohn, Nicole Hutchins, Ashwin T S, Gautam Biswas

Large language models (LLMs) have created new opportunities to assist teachers and support student learning. Methods such as chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enable LLMs to grade formative assessments in science, providing scores and relevant feedback to students. However, the extent to which these methods generalize across curricula in multiple domains (such as science, computing, and engineering) remains largely untested. In this paper, we introduce Chain-of-Thought Prompting + Active Learning (CoTAL), an LLM-based approach to formative assessment scoring that (1) leverages Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) principles to develop curriculum-aligned formative assessments and rubrics, (2) applies human-in-the-loop prompt engineering to automate response scoring, and (3) incorporates teacher and student feedback to iteratively refine assessment questions, grading rubrics, and LLM prompts for automated grading. Our findings demonstrate that CoTAL improves GPT-4's scoring performance, achieving gains of up to 24.5% over a non-prompt-engineered baseline. Both teachers and students view CoTAL as effective in scoring and explaining student responses, each providing valuable refinements to enhance grading accuracy and explanation quality.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2504.02323

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Active LearningPrompt Engineering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Human-in-the-Loop through Chain-of-Thought

2023-06-10 · Zefan Cai, Baobao Chang, Wenjuan Han

While the emergence of powerful language models along with Chain-of-thought prompting has made automation more and more omnipresent, it sometimes demonstrates its weakness in long-term or multi-step logical reasoning. Fo…

Logical Reasoning

Evaluating LLM-Based Goal Extraction in Requirements Engineering: Prompting Strategies and Their Limitations

2026-04-24 · Anna Arnaudo, Riccardo Coppola, Maurizio Morisio, Flavio Giobergia 외 arxiv

Due to the textual and repetitive nature of many Requirements Engineering (RE) artefacts, Large Language Models (LLMs) have proven useful to automate their generation and processing. In this paper, we discuss a possible …

GPTree: Towards Explainable Decision-Making via LLM-powered Decision Trees

2024-11-13 · Sichao Xiong, Yigit Ihlamur, Fuat Alican, Aaron Ontoyin Yin

Traditional decision tree algorithms are explainable but struggle with non-linear, high-dimensional data, limiting its applicability in complex decision-making. Neural networks excel at capturing complex patterns but sac…

Decision MakingFeature EngineeringFew-Shot Learning

Context Over Compute Human-in-the-Loop Outperforms Iterative Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Interview Answer Quality

2026-02-15 · Kewen Zhu, Zixi Liu, Yanjing Li, Jing Chen arxiv

Behavioral interview evaluation using large language models presents unique challenges that require structured assessment, realistic interviewer behavior simulation, and pedagogical value for candidate training. We inves…

iPrOp: Interactive Prompt Optimization for Large Language Models with a Human in the Loop

2024-12-17 · Jiahui Li, Roman Klinger

Prompt engineering has made significant contributions to the era of large language models, yet its effectiveness depends on the skills of a prompt author. Automatic prompt optimization can support the prompt development …

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelPrompt Engineering