paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

CovRL: Fuzzing JavaScript Engines with Coverage-Guided Reinforcement Learning for LLM-based Mutation

2024-02-19 · Jueon Eom, Seyeon Jeong, Taekyoung Kwon

Fuzzing is an effective bug-finding technique but it struggles with complex systems like JavaScript engines that demand precise grammatical input. Recently, researchers have adopted language models for context-aware mutation in fuzzing to address this problem. However, existing techniques are limited in utilizing coverage guidance for fuzzing, which is rather performed in a black-box manner. This paper presents a novel technique called CovRL (Coverage-guided Reinforcement Learning) that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with reinforcement learning from coverage feedback. Our fuzzer, CovRL-Fuzz, integrates coverage feedback directly into the LLM by leveraging the Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) method to construct a weighted coverage map. This map is key in calculating the fuzzing reward, which is then applied to the LLM-based mutator through reinforcement learning. CovRL-Fuzz, through this approach, enables the generation of test cases that are more likely to discover new coverage areas, thus improving vulnerability detection while minimizing syntax and semantic errors, all without needing extra post-processing. Our evaluation results indicate that CovRL-Fuzz outperforms the state-of-the-art fuzzers in terms of code coverage and bug-finding capabilities: CovRL-Fuzz identified 48 real-world security-related bugs in the latest JavaScript engines, including 39 previously unknown vulnerabilities and 11 CVEs.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2402.12222

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

reinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningVulnerability Detection

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

From Coverage to Causes: Data-Centric Fuzzing for JavaScript Engines

2025-12-19 · Kishan Kumar Ganguly, Tim Menzies arxiv

Context: Exhaustive fuzzing of modern JavaScript engines is infeasible due to the vast number of program states and execution paths. Coverage-guided fuzzers waste effort on low-risk inputs, often ignoring vulnerability-t…

Clutch Control: An Attention-based Combinatorial Bandit for Efficient Mutation in JavaScript Engine Fuzzing

2025-10-14 · Myles Foley, Sergio Maffeis, Muhammad Fakhrur Rozi, Takeshi Takahashi arxiv

JavaScript engines are widely used in web browsers, PDF readers, and server-side applications. The rise in concern over their security has led to the development of several targeted fuzzing techniques. However, existing …

Montage: A Neural Network Language Model-Guided JavaScript Engine Fuzzer

2020-01-13 · Suyoung Lee, HyungSeok Han, Sang Kil Cha, Sooel Son

JavaScript (JS) engine vulnerabilities pose significant security threats affecting billions of web browsers. While fuzzing is a prevalent technique for finding such vulnerabilities, there have been few studies that lever…

Language ModelingLanguage Modellingvalid

FuzzWiz -- Fuzzing Framework for Efficient Hardware Coverage

2024-10-23 · Deepak Narayan Gadde, Aman Kumar, Djones Lettnin, Sebastian Simon

Ever-increasing design complexity of System-on-Chips (SoCs) led to significant verification challenges. Unlike software, bugs in hardware design are vigorous and eternal i.e., once the hardware is fabricated, it cannot b…

Benchmarking

SmartOracle -- An Agentic Approach to Mitigate Noise in Differential Oracles

2026-01-21 · Srinath Srinivasan, Tim Menzies, Marcelo D'Amorim arxiv

Differential fuzzers detect bugs by executing identical inputs across distinct implementations of the same specification, such as JavaScript interpreters. Validating the outputs requires an oracle and for differential te…