Cross-Source Reasoning-based Correction for Author Name Disambiguation
Author name disambiguation is a critical challenge in academic search systems, often addressed through from-scratch and real-time disambiguation approaches. However, current algorithms remain vulnerable to cumulative errors of paper-author assignments and overlook inconsistent assignments across different sources. Resorting to expert annotation is resource-intensive. To this end, this paper explores a new perspective for author name disambiguation: cross-source correction by leveraging inconsistent assignments across sources. We propose CrossND, a full-stack framework that integrates data refinement, cross-source reasoning, and test-time scaling. First, a chain-of-refinement pipeline denoises author profiles and produces more accurate paper-author matching probabilities. Second, a supervised fine-tuning process incorporates these refined signals and a probabilistic soft logic-based cross-correction module to infer the assignments of which sources are incorrect. Third, test-time scaling further enhances the accuracy and robustness of the predictions. Experiments on real-world datasets indicate that CrossND consistently outperforms 17 baselines by leveraging cross-source reasoning without human intervention.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Who wrote this book? A challenge for e-commerce
Modern e-commerce catalogs contain millions of references, associated with textual and visual information that is of paramount importance for the products to be found via search or browsing. Of particular significance is…
Comments on Mathematical Modeling of Current Source Matrix Converter with Venturini and SVM
In this paper, authors want to comment on a recently published article describing the Mathematical Modeling of Current Source Matrix Converter (CSMC) with two modulation strategies, namely: Venturini and Space Vector Mod…
Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: A case of DBLP
Author name ambiguity in a digital library may affect the findings of research that mines authorship data of the library. This study evaluates author name disambiguation in DBLP, a widely used but insufficiently evaluate…
ORCID-linked labeled data for evaluating author name disambiguation at scale
How can we evaluate the performance of a disambiguation method implemented on big bibliographic data? This study suggests that the open researcher profile system, ORCID, can be used as an authority source to label name i…
LLMs as ASP Programmers: Self-Correction Enables Task-Agnostic Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Recent large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive reasoning milestones but continue to struggle with high computational costs, logical inconsistencies, and sharp performance degradation on high-complexity prob…