paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

CTA: Cross-Task Alignment for Better Test Time Training

2025-07-07 · Samuel Barbeau, Pedram Fekri, David Osowiechi, Ali Bahri, Moslem Yazdanpanah, Masih Aminbeidokhti, Christian Desrosiers arxiv

Deep learning models have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of computer vision tasks. However, their performance often degrades significantly when faced with distribution shifts, such as domain or dataset changes. Test-Time Training (TTT) has emerged as an effective method to enhance model robustness by incorporating an auxiliary unsupervised task during training and leveraging it for model updates at test time. In this work, we introduce CTA (Cross-Task Alignment), a novel approach for improving TTT. Unlike existing TTT methods, CTA does not require a specialized model architecture and instead takes inspiration from the success of multi-modal contrastive learning to align a supervised encoder with a self-supervised one. This process enforces alignment between the learned representations of both models, thereby mitigating the risk of gradient interference, preserving the intrinsic robustness of self-supervised learning and enabling more semantically meaningful updates at test-time. Experimental results demonstrate substantial improvements in robustness and generalization over the state-of-the-art on several benchmark datasets.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2507.05221

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Self-Supervised LearningContrastive Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Aligning Large Vision-Language Models at Test Time: A Trajectory-Guided Structured Sampling Approach

2026-08-04 · Tianbao Jiang, Weicong Ni, Gerard de Melo, Linlin Wang arxiv

Post-training reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are commonly used to align large vision-language models (LVLMs) with human intent and the requirements of visual reasoning tasks. However, existing RL-based alignment …

Reinforcement LearningMultimodal ReasoningVisual GroundingVisual Reasoning

Test-time RL alignment exposes task familiarity artifacts in LLM benchmarks

2026-03-13 · Kun Wang, Reinhard Heckel arxiv

Direct evaluation of LLMs on benchmarks can be misleading because comparatively strong performance may reflect task familiarity rather than capability. The train-before-test approach controls for task familiarity by givi…

Reinforcement Learning

Why Better Cross-Lingual Alignment Fails for Better Cross-Lingual Transfer: Case of Encoders

2026-03-19 · Yana Veitsman, Yihong Liu, Hinrich Schütze arxiv

Better cross-lingual alignment is often assumed to yield better cross-lingual transfer. However, explicit alignment techniques -- despite increasing embedding similarity -- frequently fail to improve token-level downstre…

Sentence ClassificationCross-Lingual TransferPOS Tagging

Comparison of ontology alignment systems across single matching task via the McNemar's test

2017-03-29 · Majid Mohammadi, Amir Ahooye Atashin, Wout Hofman, Yao-Hua Tan

Ontology alignment is widely-used to find the correspondences between different ontologies in diverse fields.After discovering the alignments,several performance scores are available to evaluate them.The scores typically…

Anatomy

Evaluating Language Model Agency through Negotiations

2024-01-09 · Tim R. Davidson, Veniamin Veselovsky, Martin Josifoski, Maxime Peyrard 외

We introduce an approach to evaluate language model (LM) agency using negotiation games. This approach better reflects real-world use cases and addresses some of the shortcomings of alternative LM benchmarks. Negotiation…

Decision MakingLanguage ModelingLanguage Modellingmodel