paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

CTRLEval: An Unsupervised Reference-Free Metric for Evaluating Controlled Text Generation

2022-04-02 · ACL 2022 5 · Pei Ke, Hao Zhou, Yankai Lin, Peng Li, Jie zhou, Xiaoyan Zhu, Minlie Huang

Existing reference-free metrics have obvious limitations for evaluating controlled text generation models. Unsupervised metrics can only provide a task-agnostic evaluation result which correlates weakly with human judgments, whereas supervised ones may overfit task-specific data with poor generalization ability to other datasets. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised reference-free metric called CTRLEval, which evaluates controlled text generation from different aspects by formulating each aspect into multiple text infilling tasks. On top of these tasks, the metric assembles the generation probabilities from a pre-trained language model without any model training. Experimental results show that our metric has higher correlations with human judgments than other baselines, while obtaining better generalization of evaluating generated texts from different models and with different qualities.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2204.00862

Code (1)

thu-coai/ctrleval 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingText GenerationText Infilling

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

NLG Evaluation Metrics Beyond Correlation Analysis: An Empirical Metric Preference Checklist

2023-05-15 · Iftitahu Ni'mah, Meng Fang, Vlado Menkovski, Mykola Pechenizkiy

In this study, we analyze automatic evaluation metrics for Natural Language Generation (NLG), specifically task-agnostic metrics and human-aligned metrics. Task-agnostic metrics, such as Perplexity, BLEU, BERTScore, are …

Controllable Language ModellingDialogue GenerationLanguage Modellingnlg evaluation+3

USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generation

2020-05-01 · ACL 2020 6 · Shikib Mehri, Maxine Eskenazi

The lack of meaningful automatic evaluation metrics for dialog has impeded open-domain dialog research. Standard language generation metrics have been shown to be ineffective for evaluating dialog models. To this end, th…

Dialogue EvaluationOpen-Domain DialogText Generation

REFLEX: Reference-Free Evaluation of Log Summarization via Large Language Model Judgment

2025-11-06 · Priyanka Mudgal arxiv

Evaluating log summarization systems is challenging due to the lack of high-quality reference summaries and the limitations of existing metrics like ROUGE and BLEU, which depend on surface-level lexical overlap. We intro…

A Reference-Free Framework for Evaluating Single-Frame ISP Pipelines

2026-07-25 · Yujin Cho, Sira Ferradans, Jean-Michel Morel, Gabriele Facciolo 외 arxiv

Evaluating camera image signal processing (ISP) pipelines requires measuring low-level artifacts introduced by operations such as denoising, demosaicing, tone mapping, and compression. Blind image quality assessment (IQA…

Image Quality Assessment

Evaluating Image Caption via Cycle-consistent Text-to-Image Generation

2025-01-07 · Tianyu Cui, Jinbin Bai, Guo-Hua Wang, Qing-Guo Chen 외

Evaluating image captions typically relies on reference captions, which are costly to obtain and exhibit significant diversity and subjectivity. While reference-free evaluation metrics have been proposed, most focus on c…

Contrastive LearningDiversityImage CaptioningImage Generation+2