DAGFiNN: A Conversational Conference Assistant
DAGFiNN is a conversational conference assistant that can be made available for a given conference both as a chatbot on the website and as a Furhat robot physically exhibited at the conference venue. Conference participants can interact with the assistant to get advice on various questions, ranging from where to eat in the city or how to get to the airport to which sessions we recommend them to attend based on the information we have about them. The overall objective is to provide a personalized and engaging experience and allow users to ask a broad range of questions that naturally arise before and during the conference.
Code (1)
Tasks
ChatbotSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Mirroring to Build Trust in Digital Assistants
We describe experiments towards building a conversational digital assistant that considers the preferred conversational style of the user. In particular, these experiments are designed to measure whether users prefer and…
PersonaLens: A Benchmark for Personalization Evaluation in Conversational AI Assistants
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced conversational AI assistants. However, systematically evaluating how well these assistants apply personalization--adapting to individual user preferences while completing tasks-…
Perspectives for Evaluating Conversational AI
Conversational AI systems are becoming famous in day to day lives. In this paper, we are trying to address the following key question: To identify whether design, as well as development efforts for search oriented conver…
ChatbotInformation RetrievalRetrievalCommon Conversational Community Prototype: Scholarly Conversational Assistant
This paper discusses the potential for creating academic resources (tools, data, and evaluation approaches) to support research in conversational search, by focusing on realistic information needs and conversational inte…
Conversational SearchCollaboration with Conversational AI Assistants for UX Evaluation: Questions and How to Ask them (Voice vs. Text)
AI is promising in assisting UX evaluators with analyzing usability tests, but its judgments are typically presented as non-interactive visualizations. Evaluators may have questions about test recordings, but have no way…