Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learning
With increasingly more data and computation involved in their training, machine learning models constitute valuable intellectual property. This has spurred interest in model stealing, which is made more practical by advances in learning with partial, little, or no supervision. Existing defenses focus on inserting unique watermarks in a model's decision surface, but this is insufficient: the watermarks are not sampled from the training distribution and thus are not always preserved during model stealing. In this paper, we make the key observation that knowledge contained in the stolen model's training set is what is common to all stolen copies. The adversary's goal, irrespective of the attack employed, is always to extract this knowledge or its by-products. This gives the original model's owner a strong advantage over the adversary: model owners have access to the original training data. We thus introduce $dataset$ $inference$, the process of identifying whether a suspected model copy has private knowledge from the original model's dataset, as a defense against model stealing. We develop an approach for dataset inference that combines statistical testing with the ability to estimate the distance of multiple data points to the decision boundary. Our experiments on CIFAR10, SVHN, CIFAR100 and ImageNet show that model owners can claim with confidence greater than 99% that their model (or dataset as a matter of fact) was stolen, despite only exposing 50 of the stolen model's training points. Dataset inference defends against state-of-the-art attacks even when the adversary is adaptive. Unlike prior work, it does not require retraining or overfitting the defended model.
Code (1)
Tasks
BIG-bench Machine LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
VeriDIP: Verifying Ownership of Deep Neural Networks through Privacy Leakage Fingerprints
Deploying Machine Learning as a Service gives rise to model plagiarism, leading to copyright infringement. Ownership testing techniques are designed to identify model fingerprints for verifying plagiarism. However, previ…
Proofs of Ownership for Machine Learning Models
With the increasing adoption of Machine Learning, protecting model ownership has become an essential challenge. We initiate a formal study of Proof of Ownership for machine learning models: under what conditions can one …
Whose Is This?: Context-Aware Object Ownership Inference with Uncertainty-Guided Questioning
Service robots must infer object ownership to correctly interpret instructions such as "bring me my cup." However, ownership is a latent attribute that cannot be directly observed, and existing methods often rely on limi…
Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practice
Training machine learning (ML) models typically involves expensive iterative optimization. Once the model's final parameters are released, there is currently no mechanism for the entity which trained the model to prove t…
Binary Linear Tree Commitment-based Ownership Protection for Distributed Machine Learning
Distributed machine learning enables parallel training of extensive datasets by delegating computing tasks across multiple workers. Despite the cost reduction benefits of distributed machine learning, the dissemination o…