Decoding Biases: Automated Methods and LLM Judges for Gender Bias Detection in Language Models
Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled at language understanding and generating human-level text. However, even with supervised training and human alignment, these LLMs are susceptible to adversarial attacks where malicious users can prompt the model to generate undesirable text. LLMs also inherently encode potential biases that can cause various harmful effects during interactions. Bias evaluation metrics lack standards as well as consensus and existing methods often rely on human-generated templates and annotations which are expensive and labor intensive. In this work, we train models to automatically create adversarial prompts to elicit biased responses from target LLMs. We present LLM- based bias evaluation metrics and also analyze several existing automatic evaluation methods and metrics. We analyze the various nuances of model responses, identify the strengths and weaknesses of model families, and assess where evaluation methods fall short. We compare these metrics to human evaluation and validate that the LLM-as-a-Judge metric aligns with human judgement on bias in response generation.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Bias DetectionGender Bias DetectionResponse GenerationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Toward Robust LLM-Based Judges: Taxonomic Bias Evaluation and Debiasing Optimization
Large language model (LLM)-based judges are widely adopted for automated evaluation and reward modeling, yet their judgments are often affected by judgment biases. Accurately evaluating these biases is essential for ensu…
Reinforcement LearningContrastive LearningHumans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biases
Adopting human and large language models (LLM) as judges (a.k.a human- and LLM-as-a-judge) for evaluating the performance of LLMs has recently gained attention. Nonetheless, this approach concurrently introduces potentia…
MisinformationIdentifying Gender Stereotypes and Biases in Automated Translation from English to Italian using Similarity Networks
This paper is a collaborative effort between Linguistics, Law, and Computer Science to evaluate stereotypes and biases in automated translation systems. We advocate gender-neutral translation as a means to promote gender…
Machine TranslationTranslationJudicial Favoritism of Politicians: Evidence from Small Claims Court
Multiple studies have documented racial, gender, political ideology, or ethnical biases in comparative judicial systems. Supplementing this literature, we investigate whether judges rule cases differently when one of the…
Using Item Response Theory to Measure Gender and Racial Bias of a BERT-based Automated English Speech Assessment System
Recent advances in natural language processing and transformer-based models have made it easier to implement accurate, automated English speech assessments. Yet, without careful examination, applications of these models …